Revis was on Boldin most of the game. On the play that Crabtree got his TD, Revis was actually blanketing Boldin who was Kap's first read so he had to run out of the pocket and eventually found Crabtree open in the corner who was being covered by Banks.So yea, Crabtree is a moron.
Revis did not have a very good game. He definitely did not come close to earning $1 million. He hasn't been a $16 million dollar man all year. We totally overpaid for him.
especially since we had to cut 3 or 4 players to get under the cap .. . . . .oh .. . yeah . . . nevermind. The billionaire onwers of the Bucs and ManU appreciate your sending them investment advice . . . . . from the library computer?
That isn't my point. Why overpay someone? What does cap room have to do with overpaying someone? That doesn't sound like good business sense to me. I simply stated he hasn't come close to earning his $16 million here. If you disagree, feel free to bring your side. I'm sorry but "well we can afford it" isn't an answer.Also, the Glazers suck at picking coaches and/or GMs. They really do. They may have billions but they can't pick a coach to save a franchise.
They picked Gruden.ManU has won championships under them too I believe.
Gruden was a great grab, no doubt. But that was over a decade ago. What have you done for us lately?They got one of the best managers of all-time in Sir Alex Ferguson. He was already there when they bought ManU. He's gone. Let's see how much they win without Sir Alex.
The only reason he is talking smack is that he knows he won't face Revis anytime soon. Lets turn this ship around and I hope we face them next year in the playoffs and beat the living crap out of them.
The only reason he is talking smack is that he knows he won't face Revis anytime soon. Lets turn this ship around and I hope we face them next year in the playoffs and beat the living crap out of them.
Cue Jim Mora "Playoffs?! Playoffs?!!"
Revis did not have a very good game. He definitely did not come close to earning $1 million. He hasn't been a $16 million dollar man all year. We totally overpaid for him.
especially since we had to cut 3 or 4 players to get under the cap .. . . . .oh .. . yeah . . . nevermind. The billionaire onwers of the Bucs and ManU appreciate your sending them investment advice . . . . . from the library computer?
That isn't my point. Why overpay someone? What does cap room have to do with overpaying someone? That doesn't sound like good business sense to me. I simply stated he hasn't come close to earning his $16 million here. If you disagree, feel free to bring your side. I'm sorry but "well we can afford it" isn't an answer.Also, the Glazers suck at picking coaches and/or GMs. They really do. They may have billions but they can't pick a coach to save a franchise.
Somehow I knew you would turn this from a Revis/Crabtree discussion to the Glazers. No, youre not fixiated at all.
I don't think he actually turned it.
Revis did not have a very good game. He definitely did not come close to earning $1 million. He hasn't been a $16 million dollar man all year. We totally overpaid for him.
Agreed. Revis has gotten lucky this year could be a lot uglier. Mike Wallace had him burned for an 80-yard touchdown but Tannehill overthrew him. Calvin Johnson had him beat for a completion but Stafford missed the throw. That easily could have gone for six. Don't get me wrong, Revis is still a damn good corner, but he isn't the player he was. The old Revis never would have gotten burned by Ted Ginn for a touchdown. Richard Sherman and Joe Haden have had much better years. Considering Revis is approaching 30 the expectations need to be realistic with him.
Revis did not have a very good game. He definitely did not come close to earning $1 million. He hasn't been a $16 million dollar man all year. We totally overpaid for him.
especially since we had to cut 3 or 4 players to get under the cap .. . . . .oh .. . yeah . . . nevermind. The billionaire onwers of the Bucs and ManU appreciate your sending them investment advice . . . . . from the library computer?
That isn't my point. Why overpay someone? What does cap room have to do with overpaying someone? That doesn't sound like good business sense to me. I simply stated he hasn't come close to earning his $16 million here. If you disagree, feel free to bring your side. I'm sorry but "well we can afford it" isn't an answer.Also, the Glazers suck at picking coaches and/or GMs. They really do. They may have billions but they can't pick a coach to save a franchise.
Somehow I knew you would turn this from a Revis/Crabtree discussion to the Glazers. No, youre not fixiated at all.
Come on, read the thread. I didn't bring them up. I was responding to Vin who posted about them. At least TRY to get the story right.
Revis did not have a very good game. He definitely did not come close to earning $1 million. He hasn't been a $16 million dollar man all year. We totally overpaid for him.
Agreed. Revis has gotten lucky this year could be a lot uglier. Mike Wallace had him burned for an 80-yard touchdown but Tannehill overthrew him. Calvin Johnson had him beat for a completion but Stafford missed the throw. That easily could have gone for six. Don't get me wrong, Revis is still a damn good corner, but he isn't the player he was. The old Revis never would have gotten burned by Ted Ginn for a touchdown. Richard Sherman and Joe Haden have had much better years. Considering Revis is approaching 30 the expectations need to be realistic with him.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^In a nut-shell.....Revis is damn near 30, he will never be the player he once was. Did the Bucs over pay? I dont know, Can they fix it if they did? Yes, restructure
Revis did not have a very good game. He definitely did not come close to earning $1 million. He hasn't been a $16 million dollar man all year. We totally overpaid for him.
especially since we had to cut 3 or 4 players to get under the cap .. . . . .oh .. . yeah . . . nevermind. The billionaire onwers of the Bucs and ManU appreciate your sending them investment advice . . . . . from the library computer?
That isn't my point. Why overpay someone? What does cap room have to do with overpaying someone? That doesn't sound like good business sense to me. I simply stated he hasn't come close to earning his $16 million here. If you disagree, feel free to bring your side. I'm sorry but "well we can afford it" isn't an answer..
Maybe my type was not clear. I did "bring my side" about something that you think "doesn't make good business sense." As I said, the billionaire owners of the Bucs and ManU appreciate your sending them investment advice.On the football side . . you know, where we are not making up stuff just to complain. . I could get your point if the Revis deal caused the team to drop other players. It did not, so what's the point? By the way, you're one of those who complained that the Bucs were under spending before, right?
The "still under the cap"argument is ridiculous. We have no idea what the glazers personal cap was for one thing, it's not just a salary for this year, so it will impact us later if he doesn't restructure later, it's money that could have been spent elsewhere to better effect and the big problem with the Revision deal isn't just the money, it's the picks we lost for the privilege of overpaying for one extra year of a guy who was going to be a FA next year anyway
The "still under the cap"argument is ridiculous. We have no idea what the glazers personal cap was for one thing, it's not just a salary for this year, so it will impact us later if he doesn't restructure later, it's money that could have been spent elsewhere to better effect and the big problem with the Revision deal isn't just the money, it's the picks we lost for the privilege of overpaying for one extra year of a guy who was going to be a FA next year anyway
Great post. And K-Swiss is right the Bucs should restructure that money lower in the near future. I can't help but think that the team would be better off in the long run if they had used that pick on Sheldon Richardson or Star Lotulelei, spent/saved money on some other corners like Keenan Lewis and Sean Smith. Who knows who they could have with that third round pick in this year's draft.
The "still under the cap"argument is ridiculous. We have no idea what the glazers personal cap was for one thing, it's not just a salary for this year, so it will impact us later if he doesn't restructure later, it's money that could have been spent elsewhere to better effect and the big problem with the Revision deal isn't just the money, it's the picks we lost for the privilege of overpaying for one extra year of a guy who was going to be a FA next year anyway
I was going to say the same thing about an "internal" cap. That's money out of the Glazers pocket regardless. There could easily be a spending limit LOWER than our cap.
We could have saved not only the Revis money, but Goldsons money and drafted Reid or Vaccaro and have 24 million to spend elsewhere and keep our third rounder this year.
Revis did not have a very good game. He definitely did not come close to earning $1 million. He hasn't been a $16 million dollar man all year. We totally overpaid for him.
especially since we had to cut 3 or 4 players to get under the cap .. . . . .oh .. . yeah . . . nevermind. The billionaire onwers of the Bucs and ManU appreciate your sending them investment advice . . . . . from the library computer?
That isn't my point. Why overpay someone? What does cap room have to do with overpaying someone? That doesn't sound like good business sense to me. I simply stated he hasn't come close to earning his $16 million here. If you disagree, feel free to bring your side. I'm sorry but "well we can afford it" isn't an answer.Also, the Glazers suck at picking coaches and/or GMs. They really do. They may have billions but they can't pick a coach to save a franchise.
Somehow I knew you would turn this from a Revis/Crabtree discussion to the Glazers. No, youre not fixiated at all.
Come on, read the thread. I didn't bring them up. I was responding to Vin who posted about them. At least TRY to get the story right.
Oh but I did. He made a sarcastic comment about ownership...targeted at you BTW, and of course you saw an opening and ran with it. Again. Broken. Effin. Record.MiltonMack and the Java Sockpuppets provide more meaningful insight than you could ever muster.
