Hey guys, this thread cuts down to about 5 pages after you hide all of bill-kir's idiotic comments. You should try it!
name calling, Classy!It says a lot about you too, enjoy!and i'll try my best to leave facts out of the next discussion, i can see how they get in the way at times.
I didnt call anyone any names.
Buggsy cherry picking two games the Bucs were trailing the majority of the game to support his agument, lol. Wow , impressively misleading and pointless....even when you ignore the fact that the "Bucs not really running that often on 2nd and Forever" was never his argument.His argument was that "constantly running on 2nd and forever is a good thing and not problematic at all". Poor Buggsy was having trouble with the concept of favorable down and distance , and too stupid to let it go. LMAOScarecrow confused about the argument (as usual) , butthurt , and flailing again. In short : he mad. Stick to quoting other posters out of context , slugger. You arent smart enough for debate.
Buggsy the Scarecrow still confused why consisting running on 2nd and 10 might be a troublesome tendency.So much so that he keeps bringing it up out of the blue. LMAO. Someone want to break out the crayons and construction paper for our lil slugger ?
Since simpletons like yourself started perpetuating this myth of always running on second down for the last few games, I decided to look it up. Per the usual, you haven't got a clue:Game 15: The Buccaneers had 19 second downs in this game. They threw the ball 12 times and ran it 7 times, for pass/run percentage of 63%/37%.Game 16: The Buccaneers had 21 second downs in this game. They threw the ball 14 times and ran it 7 times, for a pass/run percentage of 67%/33%.Is that plain enough for you, slugger?
Don't you dare present facts to get in the way of his delusions.
Blow and his argument out of the water, then watch the 'lil slugger deny argument was ever presented and invent strawman argument for the opposing side. Textbook moron.
Buggsy the Scarecrow still confused why consisting running on 2nd and 10 might be a troublesome tendency.So much so that he keeps bringing it up out of the blue. LMAO. Someone want to break out the crayons and construction paper for our lil slugger ?
Since simpletons like yourself started perpetuating this myth of always running on second down for the last few games, I decided to look it up. Per the usual, you haven't got a clue:Game 15: The Buccaneers had 19 second downs in this game. They threw the ball 12 times and ran it 7 times, for pass/run percentage of 63%/37%.Game 16: The Buccaneers had 21 second downs in this game. They threw the ball 14 times and ran it 7 times, for a pass/run percentage of 67%/33%.Is that plain enough for you, slugger?
You're leaving out a huge part of the equation- the distance on that second down. Running on 2nd and 5 is fine. Running on 2nd and 10 is ok sometimes. Running on 2nd and 20 isn't a great idea. Once in a blue moon if their look is favorable and you audible to it sure, but not with any type of regularity.
again, more information for you"However, teams can block their assistants from interviewing for "lateral" moves. While that rule makes some sense, as teams don't want their former coaches poaching talent from their staffs, the definition of a "lateral" move is far too limiting. The NFL does not distinguish between a position coach and a coordinator, meaning that a quarterback coach can be blocked from becoming another team's offensive coordinator, as the league sees that as a lateral move. "it states teams can block lateral moves, not that a lateral move is against any rule. if you know differently then please let me know .... for christ sakes
You have to keep your reputation to the rest of the league in mind too. Asking a team to interview their QB coach for a coordinator position is fine. Asking if you can have their OC to be your OC is not, even if it isn't against the rules. Its like asking your neighbor if you can have his wife. It isn't illegal, but it is highly frowned upon and may not end well for you.
Scarecrow taking a page from the Black Hole playbook and spinning the argument . Spin it you two nitwits , spin it !! LMAO
Buggsy the Scarecrow still confused why consisting running on 2nd and 10 might be a troublesome tendency.So much so that he keeps bringing it up out of the blue. LMAO. Someone want to break out the crayons and construction paper for our lil slugger ?
Since simpletons like yourself started perpetuating this myth of always running on second down for the last few games, I decided to look it up. Per the usual, you haven't got a clue:Game 15: The Buccaneers had 19 second downs in this game. They threw the ball 12 times and ran it 7 times, for pass/run percentage of 63%/37%.Game 16: The Buccaneers had 21 second downs in this game. They threw the ball 14 times and ran it 7 times, for a pass/run percentage of 67%/33%.Is that plain enough for you, slugger?
You're leaving out a huge part of the equation- the distance on that second down. Running on 2nd and 5 is fine. Running on 2nd and 10 is ok sometimes. Running on 2nd and 20 isn't a great idea. Once in a blue moon if their look is favorable and you audible to it sure, but not with any type of regularity.
LOL , yep. That and leaving out 14 other games.... but everyone already knows this. Easy to see through the weak gimmicks of the scarecrow. This is why the majority of the board ignores him.
You're leaving out a huge part of the equation- the distance on that second down. Running on 2nd and 5 is fine. Running on 2nd and 10 is ok sometimes. Running on 2nd and 20 isn't a great idea. Once in a blue moon if their look is favorable and you audible to it sure, but not with any type of regularity.
I'm not leaving anything out. The constant gripe throughout the last few Gameday threads was about how the team is constantly running on 2nd down. Here's a recent example:
Yeah our run 99.9% of the time on 2nd down tendency made that play work like a charm , lol
Now, after being called on that B/S, it's appears posters are moving the goalposts to griping about constantly running the ball on 2nd and long. So let's take a look:Of the 21 total 2nd downs the Buccaneers called plays for, 13 of those plays were on 2nd-and-8 or longer. They threw the ball 10 times and ran the ball 3 times, for a pass run percentage of 77%/23%.Is there anywhere else you fellas would like to move those goalposts? Argument 1 and 2 haven't gone so well.
I was obviously speaking in hyberbole , and Buggsy attempts to take it out of context , as if I was speaking literal. What a complete dumb ass....Everyone knows what I'm talking about with the runs on 2nd and long under Schiano , and the majority agree. It angers you , scarecrow.BTW: The only one moving the goalposts is you. Your argument was that "running on 2nd and long constantly is ok" . Now you are trying to make it " we don't run it as much as you say". Try again numb nuts .You fool no one except a butthurt blackhole. LMAO!Pathetic little simpleton .
I was obviously speaking in hyberbole
Whatever you do, don't use the word "bamboozle" ;DAlthough there has been a ton of "hyperbole" when complaining about schiano on these boards. It's the reason I defended him more often than not
Your argument was that "running on 2nd and long constantly is ok" .
I've never once said that. Prove me wrong and you correct and provide the link, slugger.You suck at constructing strawmen, but you're pretty good at taking a pwning.
Running on 2nd down isn't an issue. they do need to do a better job of mixing up the type of runs they call.
U mad , Scarecrow ??
Your argument was that "running on 2nd and long constantly is ok" .
Running on 2nd down isn't an issue. You can't throw it all of the time, but they do need to do a better job of mixing up the type of runs they call.
Bwahahahahahahahahahaha @ my lil slugger thinking these two statement are the same, or even in the same ballpark.Simpletons will be simpletons.
