The Fowl is a liability in any alignment.
Sign him and run a base 4-2-5!
Exactly what I was thinking. This passing league may make that the norm
Problem is that you are still rolling 2 CB's out there and as much as I like Byrd I don't want him manned up on a slot WR. That 3 S set says we are in a zone only.
Not necessarily. Roll Barron down to LB next to David. 3 CB's with Byrd playing center field and Goldson as a roving hammer/yellow flag.
So really a heavy nickle, still want to get Goldosn out of that alignment but that is my bias that I want him out of ANY alignment.
Yea, pretty much. Im in the same boat that if we could somehow swap out Goldson for Byrd that would be an incredible move...but I think most of us understand the reality there. Peter King should know better.
Sign him and run a base 4-2-5!
Exactly what I was thinking. This passing league may make that the norm
Problem is that you are still rolling 2 CB's out there and as much as I like Byrd I don't want him manned up on a slot WR. That 3 S set says we are in a zone only.
Not necessarily. Roll Barron down to LB next to David. 3 CB's with Byrd playing center field and Goldson as a roving hammer/yellow flag.
So really a heavy nickle, still want to get Goldosn out of that alignment but that is my bias that I want him out of ANY alignment.
Yea, pretty much. Im in the same boat that if we could somehow swap out Goldson for Byrd that would be an incredible move...but I think most of us understand the reality there. Peter King should know better.
The hit isn't that bad. I think Booker said that it is a net 0 effect on the cap to cut him so in a world where we have $30m in cap room we can afford both. Then, going forward it is also fairly cap neutral because you are swapping out Goldson's deal for Byrd's deal.
The hit isn't that bad. I think Booker said that it is a net 0 effect on the cap to cut him so in a world where we have $30m in cap room we can afford both. Then, going forward it is also fairly cap neutral because you are swapping out Goldson's deal for Byrd's deal.
The hit isn't that bad. I think Booker said that it is a net 0 effect on the cap to cut him so in a world where we have $30m in cap room we can afford both. Then, going forward it is also fairly cap neutral because you are swapping out Goldson's deal for Byrd's deal.
I dont understand how he got a net 0 on the cap affect of cutting him. He has $9M contract fully guaranteed this year, and $3M of next years. If we were to cut him that would get accelerated to a $12M cap hit this year for not having him on the team. I could see a trade if we paid some of this year's salary in a restructure.
The hit isn't that bad. I think Booker said that it is a net 0 effect on the cap to cut him so in a world where we have $30m in cap room we can afford both. Then, going forward it is also fairly cap neutral because you are swapping out Goldson's deal for Byrd's deal.
I dont understand how he got a net 0 on the cap affect of cutting him. He has $9M contract fully guaranteed this year, and $3M of next years. If we were to cut him that would get accelerated to a $12M cap hit this year for not having him on the team. I could see a trade if we paid some of this year's salary in a restructure.
