I'm asking a favor from Nobody, or from anyone with keen insight and access to All-22: Could you take statistically random passes from Dak Prescott and Marcus Mariota and analyze the plays according to the degree of difficulty, execution and production relative to intended outcome?
The reason I ask is, I have always followed the narrative that these two quarterbacks benefit from somewhat simplified schemes and contribution from their excellent supporting cast, in turn inflating their production and causing them to be evaluated higher than their true abilities. I kind of blindly followed that logic, but I'm not sure if that's a fair assumption. I'd like to see evidence on that. Maybe there are some benefits we can see what we can learn and adapt to the Bucs? I'd really appreciate it.
PS - I'm not trying to trash either of these QBs to elevate Jameis. I'm a Jameis fan, but I have no problems admitting they have outproduced and outplayed Jameis, on average. I'm just trying to see what kinds of adaptations teams made for these QBs to tailor to their strengths and weaknesses.
