Liam has been an excellent hire
They went way heavier in running towards the left side
and even some of their most successful right side runs have been counters with left side pulling (so really LT and LG). This is White's 56 yarder:
https://www.buccaneers.com/video/white-56-yard-run-bucs-falcons-nfl-week-5-big-play-2024
Bowles praising Irving for bouncing back after a fumble in the prior game
It was great for him because he was making some tough runs,” Bowles said of Irving. “He wasn’t trying to score every play. He was slamming it up in there when he had to slam it up in there. He was slicing back when he had to slice back. He protected well. He caught the ball well, him and Sean [Tucker] both. For him to come back after the fumble last week [in Atlanta] is great to see.”“
Todd Bowles says the Bucs will play all three RBs (Rachaad White, Bucky Irving & Sean Tucker) when White is healthy and they will go with the “hot hand.”
I'm fine with all 3 RB's getting involved, each of them offer something a little bit different. White at this stage is the most balanced out the three but I'm fine with using Tuck/Bucky as well since they are both weapons as receivers too. Whatever we do, keep using the gap run scheme!
Pretty awesome that some in this thread are early on saying "we need them both" and now its potentially three.
All three are good and Coen is really coming into his own in terms of figuring out what works best
I am a fan of White but is it possible he slides down the chart? Hard to picture him consistently running with the approach we see so far from Irving and Tucker.
Not "sliding down the chart" and no dancing from White - something he improved upon last season unbeknownst to your dumbass.
You're 0/2 here, keeping your lifetime average at .000.
Check in after Week 1: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 2: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 3: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 4: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 5: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 6: Rachaad White - Inactive w/Injury. Still #1 on the Depth Chart.
Check in after Week 7: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
I can keep this up, or you can man up and admit you were wrong about "sliding down the chart," White's place on the depth chart was secure in the preseason, and you were unaware that White stopped the dancing last season. That's all it will take, but I'm guessing I'll be making a similar post this time next week.
I am a fan of White but is it possible he slides down the chart? Hard to picture him consistently running with the approach we see so far from Irving and Tucker.
Not "sliding down the chart" and no dancing from White - something he improved upon last season unbeknownst to your dumbass.
You're 0/2 here, keeping your lifetime average at .000.
Check in after Week 1: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 2: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 3: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 4: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 5: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 6: Rachaad White - Inactive w/Injury. Still #1 on the Depth Chart.
Check in after Week 7: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
I can keep this up, or you can man up and admit you were wrong about "sliding down the chart," White's place on the depth chart was secure in the preseason, and you were unaware that White stopped the dancing last season. That's all it will take, but I'm guessing I'll be making a similar post this time next week.
Check in after Week 8: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
I figured I would be posting this again. Absolutely no shame.
I figured I would be posting this again. Absolutely no shame
Good for you. Awareness is the start!
I am a fan of White but is it possible he slides down the chart? Hard to picture him consistently running with the approach we see so far from Irving and Tucker.
Not "sliding down the chart" and no dancing from White - something he improved upon last season unbeknownst to your dumbass.
You're 0/2 here, keeping your lifetime average at .000.
Check in after Week 1: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 2: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 3: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 4: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 5: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Check in after Week 6: Rachaad White - Inactive w/Injury. Still #1 on the Depth Chart.
Check in after Week 7: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
I can keep this up, or you can man up and admit you were wrong about "sliding down the chart," White's place on the depth chart was secure in the preseason, and you were unaware that White stopped the dancing last season. That's all it will take, but I'm guessing I'll be making a similar post this time next week.
Check in after Week 8: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
I figured I would be posting this again. Absolutely no shame.
Check in after Week 9: Rachaad White is the starting RB.
Shameless ignoramus.
Since being offensive player of the week, Tucker has had multiple snaps on 4 drives. The Bucs have scored touchdowns on 3 of them.
Since being offensive player of the week, Tucker has had multiple snaps on 4 drives. The Bucs have scored touchdowns on 3 of them.
I’m not sure this is slam dunk you think it is. Correlation isn’t causation. You could probably say the same thing for Sterling Shepherd or some other blah player.
Gee, I wonder just who is making these personnel decisions at RB during the games? I find it hard to believe Coen is leaving Tucker on ice given the results.
