Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
Was just wondering how many others think think that allowing Giles and Gruber cheapens the honor for guys like Sapp, Brooks, and Selmon. Also seems that it takes away from the significance of having a ring of honor, and probably garners laughs from packer/cowboy/insert-any-org.-with-any-historic-significance fans who see the "historically great players" in Tampas ROH. Maybe its just me. Theres plenty of 'very good' former Bucs who shoild be honored, just not with the ring of honor.
Posted : May. 16, 2014 8:31 pm