Last seen: Mar. 25, 2026 12:32 pm
For those that succumb to recency bias, sure. For those that don't, it doesn't.
You seem to be talking about preseason expectations vs. end-of-year results and juxtaposing that with whether the season was successful or unsuccessfu...
Unsurprisingly, you're voting for the team that won less football games and lost more football games as being more successful. I think that m...
I suppose I'll have to take your lack of direct answer, as you've skillfully evaded once again, and read between the lines. Agreed.
This is all true, but leaves off the playoff loss in the next game. You skillfully evaded the question, and I'm genuinely curious to know your answer:...
The data is the data. I'm not addressing Mayfield at all. In the NFL - and all professional sports for that matter - "success" is gauged by winning ga...
Amended for playoff records, snookums: 2005: 11-6 or .647 winning percentage2010: 10-6 or .625 winning percentage2016: 9-7 or .563 winning perce...
Congrats to CJ Stroud on one helluva season and winning the Offensive Rookie of the Year award. Not sure how he pulled that off, being from Ohio State...
I'm not sure what this simpleton loves more, coach speak or drinking & driving?
It's entirely possible he would have had 10+ sacks this season, if the decision-makers would have played him more. JTS started 12 games (5 sacks) and ...
Are the Tampa Bay Buccaneers playing in and winning the Superbowl on Sunday? If so, I'll be coming to your side of the argument. This definitely will ...
It's always cute when posters present opinions as facts. 2005: 11-5 or .689 winning percentage 2010: 10-6 or .625 winning percentage 2016: 9-7 o...
Correct. It was Josh McCown that started the majority of Evans' first season, not Josh Freeman.
I say 99.7%, if not higher, would agree that 2005 was the most splendid season ever. I enjoy yanking things from my ass as well.
It must not be as obvious as you think, since you’re having to shift from “successful” to “joy.” The reason you are doing that is quite obvious: it’s ...
