Last seen: Jun. 24, 2026 3:14 pm
Sauce Gardner to the Colts for two 1st rounders
As an aside and/or just to move off the topic of Godwin . . . . . .one curiosity in the NFL these days is how much alternative stats supp...
The comparison is that they done quit. In other words, the two things discussed -- ESPN Win Probability and SHUTTING THINGS DOWN - are not really rela...
No doubt and they won running ie the Canales way To be fair, a bit of a trap game for the Packers. Looking past them to the Eagles, maybe.
My guess would be some boring reason like an internal policy change, but who knows? I wonder if the Bucs would say the difference with McMillan is jus...
I didn't know that about the Ravens but looking at it now maybe it undercuts the idea that the Bucs odd reporting is for competitive advantage? The...
Most of the trade talk had been about an edge rusher. It seems most agree that is unlikely now, but it might have bene unlikely always: "T...
so says the mouse who thinks the lab is a wellness retreat . . . "Look at me" gleefully running through the maze, day after day LOL  ...
agreed The NFL is tough to predict. Razor thin margins to begin and the insane impact of injuries. Most fans puzzled by the Egbuka pick, ...
The Cowboys are down 2 scores 2 minute warning, QB just sacked. The Cardinals are probably 90+ % win probability. Dak in, Lamb in secon...
The Cowboys are down 3 scores in the 4th. Do they pull Lamb? Maybe (btw Prescott throwing lasers and they are still losing)
We probably split with the Panthers. I don't know that it matters much then though because the Panthers hopefully struggle is some of their upcoming ...
The Bengals and the Bears both ignored the probabilities. That's how football is played every game
There aren't t though. no need to debate it further I agree but now I see the pint you're making which is probabilities. The probability of a Buc w...
I see it thanks the Bears had a 99.7% win probability up two scores in the 4th that means the Bengals should've packed it in. They didn...
