I think it may be a little more nuanced than that. the line has improved just by adding Barton but even Barton is learning. the line may also be...

Well, to each their own but earlier you credit DH's post of JQ a context, right? DH omitted the end where JQ actually AGREES with my positionS (plu...

Biggs, just to highlight how dishonest you are. This thread was dead until you bumped it Thats on page 7

Actually, if you read the quote of the Josh Q thread his CONCLUSION about team is the same as me and WT … the team needs BOTH And also about White v...

So was this from Josh Q "The lone note I have on this rep is for White. As compared to most people who are hyper-focused on the Bucs, I am pretty do...

The relevant sample size is not 4. The sample size is in excess of 400 runs, I think? Irving should get more runs (something I suggested in the p...

um . . okay

Thats Bowles and now Coen saying the obvious about the "hot hand" Irving. He's EARNED more Like WT said before and I have said, the Bucs need B...

Wait, what about this Coen "coach speak?" “It’s hard to ignore, I mean, he touches the ball and typically some good things have occurred,” Coen ...

you mean . . .like Bowles comment are "coach speak" but the comments by the "guy who calls the offense" is not? weird

right on cue the answer: never lol

lol we are now saying 6.2 is - when put in context - no better than 2.1 (NOT FACTUAL ) because IF you take out that ON E long run in ONE game an...

yes! Its like the play caller is a rookie! oh … well

and claiming this is just "coach speak" BOWLES, asked why Irving did not get the ball more - “We were behind. We threw it a little bit more, Rac...

This ^^ is the beauty of the Red Board. If the roles were reversed the Irving side would be calling me a "White apologist" or something like "White...