It's a good point but I think he's a top 20 pick on our board. I'm good with it. Time will tell

It's a need if you think longer and bigger. I give the pick a B+. Draft good players and don't reach based on need

I don't mind the pick. He's gonna be good. All the defensive players are the same. They're ok but not elite.

I've been preaching wr need

Crazy how stats work... It's almost like being down will mean he's in more and catching more passes. Crazy

You cannot be serious with this stupid shit. Baker threw for 12 yards less than 300 yards based solely on it being a blowout or he would have EASILY...

But you are cherry picking. Just because you get to the objection doesn't make it meaningless. You're gonna pass more when you're down (see Ravens g...

I'm sure he could see 50% of the plays. Evans and Tet out wide, Godwin in the slot. Jalen can split some time and spell Godwin. Tet can spell Evans....

It wasn't textbook average. That's where you're on an island. It didn't force turnovers or punts or 3 and outs. It played better vs bad teams with b...

Dart has the best bang for buck value. I also just think he's better than Sanders so... I still hope they go Dart but I'd prefer they take Sanders

He was critical of him at times but the conclusions he's drawing are insane. Offense was elite. Defense was bad. It doesn't take advanced analyt...

Yeah but we had to struggle with Breadson failing to get to the second level so it's a wash. Right?

I'm all for it because Tet is better than all of those players sans Hunter

It's still substantial enough to warrant a year with him being the weakest link on a strong line

You're nitpicking AND cherry picking. No offensive coordinator is perfect. Coen pitched a hell of a year but he's not without fault or criticism... ...