FAB 3. Evans Has Eyes On The Hall Of Fame

With Bucs wide receiver Mike Evans already owning a couple of significant Tampa Bay receiving records – most receiving touchdowns in a season (12) and career touchdowns (35) – and the career receiving record about to fall on Sunday in Atlanta, it appears as if he’s destined to make his second Pro Bowl this year if he keeps producing at a high level.

Evans has 29 receptions for 426 yards and three touchdowns this season and is on pace to finish the 2018 campaign with 116 catches for 1,704 yards and 12 touchdowns. If those numbers hold, that would represent five straight 1,000-yard seasons to start his NFL career, which would tie Cincinnati’s A.J. Green for second place with that distinction. Hall of Fame wide receiver Randy Moss set an NFL record by posting six straight 1,000-yard seasons from 1998-2003 to start his pro career.

Bucs WR Mike Evans – Photo by: Getty Images
Bucs WR Mike Evans – Photo by: Getty Images

If he stays healthy this year and keeps producing, a second Pro Bowl berth becomes inevitable for Evans this year. So does an induction into the Bucs Ring of Honor once Evans’ surpasses James Wilder’s career receptions franchise record of 430, which will happen next year if he maintains good health and productivity. Evans is 93 catches away from toppling that mark.

A looming Bucs Ring of Honor induction seems like a foregone conclusion at this point, but what about the Pro Football Hall of Fame?

“Of course, of course, of course – yeah, I want to be in the Hall of Fame,” Evans said. “I want to go down as one of the best receivers to play the game. That’s why I play.”

So when Evans has amassed close to 400 career catches for 6,000 career yards by the end of the 2018 season, how much further will he have to go to have a Hall of Fame-type career? Well, there are five Hall of Fame receivers with less than 10,000 career yards that have made it to Canton.

5 Hall of Fame receivers have less than 10,000 career receiving yards
Lynn Swann (1974-82) – 336 receptions for 5,462 yards and 51 TDs
Paul Warfield (1964-77) – 427 receptions for 8,565 yards and 85 TDs
John Stallworth (1974-87) – 537 receptions for 8,723 yards and 63 TDs
Charley Taylor (1964-77) – 649 receptions for 9,110 yards and 79 TDs
Fred Biletnikoff (1965-78) – 589 receptions for 8,974 yards and 76 TDs

Evans could be in their class if he maintains his average of 1,200 yards per season for eight seasons. The Bucs’ former first-round pick would be 28 by then and have three years left on the six-year contract extension he signed this offseason that pays him an average of $16.5 million per season. Maintaining that average, Evans would have approximately 9,600 career receiving yards by then if he were to remain healthy and productive.

Bucs WR Mike Evans – Photo by: Cliff Welch/PR
Bucs WR Mike Evans – Photo by: Cliff Welch/PR

But those five receivers with less than 10,000 career receiving yards didn’t play in the modern era of football, and that’s what Evans will be measured against when it comes time for Hall of Fame consideration.

Since Jerry Rice’s induction into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 2010, all seven of the latest Hall of Fame receivers – Rice, Cris Carter, Andre Reed, Tim Brown, Marvin Harrison, Terrell Owens and Randy Moss – have had at least 13,000 career yards and played in the league at least 12 seasons, as was the case with Harrison (2016) and Moss (2018). Six of the seven have played in at least one Super Bowl (Carter is the exception), and all but one – Reed – had at least 100 career touchdown receptions. Reed had 87 career TDs.

Those are the types of numbers that Evans will need to hit in order to make the Hall of Fame – in addition to helping the Bucs get to a Super Bowl.

“I just want to be consistent as long as I’m playing,” Evans said. “I want to be at the top level as long as I’m playing. Whenever I feel like I’m slowing down consistently I’ll call it quits. I’m not that guy that’s going to steal checks. If I’m not playing at a high level I don’t want to play.”

“I’ll play as long as I can. I’m 25 now and God’s blessed me really well. I’ve never had any significant injury thus far. If I stay injury-free I can play pretty long and I’ll just have to take care of my body even better.”

To some of his younger teammates, Evans has already achieved legend status. In the eyes of tight end O.J. Howard, Evans is blazing a trail to the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

Bucs WR Mike Evans – Photo by: Mark Lomoglio/PR
Bucs WR Mike Evans – Photo by: Mark Lomoglio/PR

“That’s where he’s headed,” Howard said. “This guy’s a very productive, a very good player. And he’s different – he’s a big, fast receiver, the kind you don’t see that much. He can ball. He’s up there every year with the top five receivers. It’s just that national stage – with guys like Antonio Brown and other guys get known and stuff like that. But people know Mike and what he is, so when the time comes he’ll be mentioned with top receivers.

“And Mike is a guy that has done it the right way. He’s 25 years olds and he’s one catch away from being the all-time receiving yards leader in Bucs history, so he’s headed right there (to the Hall of Fame).”

Some of Evans’ performances against the Falcons have helped put him on the map nationally – much to the chagrin of Falcons head coach Dan Quinn.

“More than I care to see, that’s for sure,” Quinn said. “Here’s what I know, first things first. When he was coming out of college, he was very developed at Texas A&M. So coming into the NFL, he looked game-ready, much like on our team Calvin (Ridley) looks ready to play. That’s not always the case, but since that time, you see him go and get the contested catch as well as anybody can, and so it’s his size, yeah, and catching range, yes. But it’s really the will that he can make the plays down the field.

“When you play the X position, which Julio (Jones) plays here, you obviously got looks that are favorable at times and you’ve got to nail them. You’ve got to own them. Those are shots down the field, breaking routes, those are all the things that he does well, but I would say that the guy’s one hell of a competitor, too. And when you add the competitiveness with the talent, the size, and the range, he becomes a handful.”

Bucs WR Mike Evans – Photo by: Cliff Welch/PR
Bucs WR Mike Evans – Photo by: Cliff Welch/PR

For a franchise like Tampa Bay that has more losing seasons than winning seasons, it’s not surprising that the Bucs have only had a few sheer excellent first-round draft picks – including Hall of Famers Lee Roy Selmon (1976), left tackle Paul Gruber (1988), defensive tackle Warren Sapp (1995) and Derrick Brooks (1995) – in the team’s four decades’ worth of existence.

Add Evans’ name to that list.

And at the rate he’s going, he could be joining the likes of Selmon, Sapp and Brooks in Canton, too.

1
2
3
4
5
Previous articleWhat’s Cooking?: Ryan Smith
Next articleTampa Bay at Atlanta Injury Report: 10-12
Scott Reynolds is in his 24th year of covering the Tampa Bay Buccaneers as the vice president, publisher and senior Bucs beat writer for PewterReport.com. Author of the popular SR's Fab 5 column on Fridays, Reynolds oversees web development and forges marketing partnerships for PewterReport.com in addition to his editorial duties. A graduate of Kansas State University in 1995, Reynolds spent six years giving back to the community as the defensive line coach for his son's Pop Warner team, the South Pasco Predators. Reynolds can be reached at: [email protected]

44 COMMENTS

  1. We are 1-3? 2-2 last time I checked. Lol

    +7
    0
    Rating: +7. From 7 votes.
    Please wait...
    • Overall against Atlanta, not this season I think that sentence is reading.

      +2
      0
      Rating: +2. From 2 votes.
      Please wait...
    • Bucs are 2-2 this season – but 1-3 vs. Atlanta under Dirk Koetter as head coach and with Mike Smith as defensive coordinator.

      +10
      0
      Rating: +10. From 10 votes.
      Please wait...
  2. Don’t mean to sound negative and That’s great about the records with Evans but it would be great if he didn’t have at least one huge easy drop every game too.

    +8
    -2
    Rating: +6. From 10 votes.
    Please wait...
  3. Here is the problem with this statistical match up – the Bucs offense is not the same as it was the first four weeks, there is a different QB. No one knows how Winston will do. Most assume he will do the same or better, but there is a chance he will do worse. Namely, throw more INTs which has been something of an issue for him at times. If he does not the odds are we will see the same or better.

    +7
    -10
    Rating: -3. From 17 votes.
    Please wait...
    • We’ve also seen a couple of o-lines, and a couple Fitzpatricks. Can’t put this all on either QB.

      +7
      -1
      Rating: +6. From 8 votes.
      Please wait...
  4. Dirk is just slow to the draw, he’s a day late and a dollar short for everything. Took him a whole season and strong urging from management to turn over play calling despite the mounds of evidence that his offense wasn’t that good and the overall game management was terrible. It’s taken him 3 seasons and he still can’t see that Mike Smith is either awful or has no idea how to assemble a formidable defense in todays NFL. He says in one breath competition is key and that those who earn playing time will play then rolls Brent Grimes out there to get abused on the heels of an awful preseason and Ryan Smith playing better. He inherits LaVonte who somehow got 6 sacks in a season with Schiano yet he hasn’t amassed 6 sacks in his 3 total years on the job on a team that desperately needs it. So as much as its nice that the players like him it’s ultimately irrelevant considering he’s a bad head coach.

    +16
    -2
    Rating: +14. From 18 votes.
    Please wait...
  5. You play the way you prepare. I saw practice photo’s from yesterday, and the Bucs were outdoors, but are playing in a dome Sunday. Why not practice in that expensive indoor facility the Glazer’s bought you? It’s like needing a screw driver for a job, but using a hammer instead. Should we win the opening toss I hope Koetter doesn’t put his garbage defense on the field first cause we’ll be playing from behind the rest of the day. The Saints took the opening kick off against us, and easily scored. We were lucky to keep pace in that game, but deferring the opening kick didn’t turn out to well against the Bears. Nothing fires up a home crowd more, and a teams defense then taking the opening drive down the field for a score. It’s nice to get the ball to open the second half, but not if you’re down by 30. Koetter needs to put his best unit on the field if possible first, and it certainly isn’t the defense. Keep making the simple easily correctable mistakes, and we’ll continue to lose. Let’s hope we can out score the Falcons. It would be easier if we score first.

    +17
    0
    Rating: +17. From 17 votes.
    Please wait...
    • Teams who win the toss defer because if your defense gets them off the field you now have an opportunistic advantage to score first in both halves. It’s always worth it to defer. If you put your offense and they go three and out, now you’ve just gave that opportunity to your opponent, and the momentum.

      As far as the coin toss goes against the Bears, Koetter had no idea they would go into the locker room at the half down by 30. I don’t think anyone did. No one will ever know what the halftime score will be at the start of a game. So you can’t use that as a reason why he shouldn’t have deferred.

      +3
      -2
      Rating: +1. From 5 votes.
      Please wait...
  6. The last reason Dirk is terrible is because of what he’s asked Jameis to do since drafting him. Which is run a vertical passing attack with no running game or defense. No young QB in the league has been asked to do more offensively with less. People look at the WRs and TEs and think that his numbers should be better but that has never been how you help young QBs flourish. Dak flourished in Dallas when they ran the ball and consistently controlled the line of scrimmage, his line hasn’t been the same this season and we see how he’s regressed. Goff had Gurley his rookie year and looked absolutely terrible, he got a better HC, they improved the OL and defense and we see how his play has taken off. Mariotta has had more postseason success than Jameis but that’s bc they have a good defense and running game which take the pressure off of him. He’s not dropping back and throwing the ball 35-50 times a game like we have consistently asked him to do pretty much since day 1. Wentz took off after the got a OC that established the run and even they got the ball out of Wentz hand quickly on a lot of the passing concepts. I could go on but you get the point, I agree Jameis makes errant throws and bad reads but I saw Fitz do the exact same thing under duress bc of the strain this offense puts you under as the QB. We heard rave reviews about Godwin last year yet Dirk the OC/HC couldn’t figure out that moving Desean to the slot would allow Godwin to get on the field and give Jameis a bigger weapon on the outside? Monken takes over playcalling them boom Desean is the slot as if some great discovery was made. Dirk is terrible whether the players like him or not.

    +20
    -1
    Rating: +19. From 21 votes.
    Please wait...
    • I agree 💯 percent

      0
      0
      No votes yet.
      Please wait...
  7. One of my favorite Mike Evans plays was when he out sprinted Marshon Lattimore for a TD at the beginning of the year. Marshon is a good young DB, but he didn’t respect Evans speed. Looks like Evans offseason workouts paid off and Lattimore lay prone on the carpet wondering how he got past him.

    +16
    0
    Rating: +16. From 16 votes.
    Please wait...
  8. Making game predictions, including predicting the character of a game (offensive shootout, defensive struggle, etc.), is a very good way to look the fool.

    Seriously, how many experts in the media or commenter world predicted that Trubiskey and the Bears would put on an offensive clinic in just the last game we played? Besides nobody in the entire universe.

    I chuckle in thinking about all the times people predicted shootouts, and instead a defensive struggle ensued … and vice versa.

    Our defense has been historically bad all this season .. but nobody can guarantee that they won’t suddenly find their way and completely hogtie the Atlanta offense. Our own offence has been very good to begin but trending downward … does the downward trend continue, or does the offense suddenly go on another tear?

    The point is, nobody knows.

    That’s. Why. We. Play. The. Games.

    +8
    -2
    Rating: +6. From 10 votes.
    Please wait...
    • It’s either going to be a shoot out or a blow out. It will not be a game with offensive ineptitude from both squads. These defenses are too short handed and these offenses are too explosive. It’s pretty straight forward.

      +8
      0
      Rating: +8. From 8 votes.
      Please wait...
    • The opening line in Vegas for this game had it at a 57 o/u -3.5 Atlanta. That my friend is considered a “shootout” by the foremost experts in the world of sports gambling. And it’s because of people thinking like you that Vegas keeps growing taller and brighter.

      But I like your positive thinking, and I also think to myself, “What if the Bucs figured something out on defense over the bye and come into their own?” This is probably why I do not gamble. It’s hard for me to side with my head and bet against my heart. But it’s possible! Even a blind squirrel finds a nut, and sometimes Vegas pays out big time. However, their lines are usually spot on as they are not in the business of losing to often. This is where a lot of so called “experts” get their ammo to make bold predictions then use stats to solidify their points.

      +3
      0
      Rating: +3. From 3 votes.
      Please wait...
      • Just a note about Vegas lines. The point is to have 50% of people bet one way and 50% of people bet the other way. When you lay -110 for the over or under, the house gets the 10%. It has less to do with what happens and more to do with perception of the public to bet equally for both sides.

        +3
        0
        Rating: +3. From 3 votes.
        Please wait...
  9. It will be high scoring. If Bucs can protect we have a chance. O line better play much better Atlanta has decent pass rush even though secondary has issues like ours.

    +2
    0
    Rating: +2. From 2 votes.
    Please wait...
  10. Think Lovie Smith a few years back on national TV. You’re about to see it again. 56-10 Falcons. This coaching staff has lost this team. It’s over. The season was over before it started. They all need to go!

    +6
    -12
    Rating: -6. From 18 votes.
    Please wait...
    • Slow down there big fella. The team fully supports Koetter. It’s obvious. When players don’t like a coach, they usually are split down the middle and half run their mouth about playing time or play calling or scheme or whatever, while the other half just keep grinding through it.

      Remember Schiano? Toes on the line!! They couldn’t wait to see him gone. Half called him out, half kept quiet. Side note- Personally, I thought Schiano had a chance to get the most out of the defensive core they were building. McCoy and David were never better than they were under Schiano, in my opinion.

      +3
      -1
      Rating: +2. From 4 votes.
      Please wait...
  11. Let me get this sorted in my head a QB with a 114.4 QB rating that in 3.5 Games throw 1356 yards average 387 yards a game with 11 touchdowns is benched for a QB with a lifetime rating of 87%
    and no one on this site other than me questions the total combined intelligence of the management and coaches of this team.
    Will be interested to see how this works out, no defence and QB that average 87% rating that likes to throw ints and likes to fumble when pressured.
    Imagine that !

    +4
    -18
    Rating: -14. From 22 votes.
    Please wait...
    • The correct spelling is “defense” and “offense” (offense misspelled in an earlier post by someone else).

      Man, I’ve said it before, you dudes can’t spell! Even when you probably have a little red squiggly line below a misspelled word pointing out the error for you. I’m not trying to be condescending here, but seriously, it kills the credibility of your post. Whose going to listen to someone who can’t spell elementary grade words?

      +4
      -3
      Rating: +1. From 7 votes.
      Please wait...
      • Just trying to make the world a better place one word at a time. Well, maybe two words in that post!

        +1
        -4
        Rating: -3. From 5 votes.
        Please wait...
      • “Whose” is improperly used in your post about grammar. Proper grammar would be “Who’s” which means “Who is”.

        +10
        0
        Rating: +10. From 10 votes.
        Please wait...
        • Because it is used in the plural form of asking a question to multiple people, ‘whose’ is acceptable grammar and usage here.

          0
          -1
          Rating: -1. From 1 vote.
          Please wait...
      • Dude, you ARE condescending, and you are a liar in claiming that is not your intent to be a condescending dick when you clearly revel in being a condescending douchebag.

        As for spelling, asswipe, comments are comments and not paid publications, and apparently you are too stupid to notice that there are no red squiggly line spell checkers in the comment generator on this website.

        Finally, dickwad, if you are going to post a stupid condescending rant about other commenters not spelling every word correctly, then don’t stupidly make a far dumber grammatical error by using “whose” when you should have written “who’s”, dumbass

        0
        -1
        Rating: -1. From 1 vote.
        Please wait...
        • So your going to result to name calling?

          I used to think that most posters here were adults, but clearly that is not the case. In which, most adults should know how to spell elementary grade words, and then not result to name calling when someone tries to help out with their spelling.

          Just for the record, the red squiggly line comes from your own browser, not the website. Browsers started using them like over 10 years ago.

          0
          0
          No votes yet.
          Please wait...
    • It’s not that you’re the only one BucAssBob. Its just not logical to leave Fitz in there. Fitz is gone after this year. Jameis may or may not be gone after NEXT year. This is the year they have to figure it out with him. He was drafted #1 overall. He will be the future or they’ll likely all be gone.

      +2
      -1
      Rating: +1. From 3 votes.
      Please wait...
  12. So if I am the Falcons offense I am going to throw short passes until the blitz makes me throw deeper.
    So if I’m the Falcons defense I am respecting Winston’s mobility and pressing the WR’s.

    What do I expect from the Bucs defense; not reacting fast enough to what they are doing in order to change the vanilla scheme.
    What do I expect from Buc’s offense; score 42-45 points so we can win! Go Bucs!

    +4
    -1
    Rating: +3. From 5 votes.
    Please wait...
    • Flawed thinking Horse. Short, quick passes beat the blitz every time. Have you ever noticed how lineman and blitzers are given a free run on a screen pass? Have you heard of hot routes? The way to beat the short dink and dunk game is by NOT BLITZING. Blitzes only work to stop the intermediate and long passing plays, not the short or quick ones.

      +1
      0
      Rating: +1. From 1 vote.
      Please wait...
  13. Dude, when you have the worst defense in the league you should keep them off the field as much as possible. Ever hear the expression, put your best foot forward? When you continually give up a score deferring the kick off putting your offense in a hole to start a game, maybe you should rethink your strategy.

    +3
    0
    Rating: +3. From 3 votes.
    Please wait...
    • Evans all day long. Donald was small for a DT and it wasn’t a sure thing. Mike Evans? He was a sure thing.

      +2
      0
      Rating: +2. From 2 votes.
      Please wait...
  14. Evans is great. However, I like to start a poll with the following question?

    1) Bucs drafting Evans at #7
    2) Rams drafting Aaron Donald at #13

    Which one would you prefer?

    +1
    0
    Rating: +1. From 1 vote.
    Please wait...
    • What is your opinion PR?

      0
      0
      No votes yet.
      Please wait...
      • That’s really tough because I could see both players in the Hall of Fame. I know Mike and have covered him for five years. It’s hard for me to pick against the guy. I love him. But WRs are easier to find than dominant DTs are. I can’t bring my fingers to type it, though …

        0
        0
        No votes yet.
        Please wait...
    • Odell Beckham at 12th pick same ?

      +1
      -2
      Rating: -1. From 3 votes.
      Please wait...
      • Yes. My opinion you start building from the inside then out not withstanding franchise QB. That means you draft DL, OL. You can WRs later in the draft like Michael Thomas and Chris Godwin in the third round. You typically don’t find the Aaron Donalds of the world outside the first round.

        +1
        -1
        Rating: 0. From 2 votes.
        Please wait...
        • So you support Vita Vea over Derwin James? That’s building inside out.
          Also, you would pass on Julio Jones (#6 overall) to take Nick Fairly(next DT available was taken #13 overall)?

          +1
          -1
          Rating: 0. From 2 votes.
          Please wait...
          • Time will tell. There are exceptions to every rule. Who would you pick over Aaron Donald or Warren Sapp, not withstanding a franchise QB?

            0
            0
            No votes yet.
            Please wait...
          • How about Khalil Mack? That is building inside out. Definitely pick him over Derwin James.

            0
            0
            No votes yet.
            Please wait...
        • Name me a great WR: Jones, AB, Evans, even Jerry Rice. I will still pick Sapp, Donald, Mack every day of the week.

          0
          0
          No votes yet.
          Please wait...
  15. Surferdudes, I agree with somewhat but only because we really don’t have a defense. We have 7 guys running into each other in the back end. Dude is right and analytics support his statement.
    Unfortunately, analytics doesn’t factor in our defense.
    I hope they bring Noah Spence out of mothballs this week and use him in some imainative ways. I know, I know, but I can hope. Blitz him as a standup LB from the end, blitz him up the middle. Run some stunts and crosses try a safety or CB blitz for gods sake but please just do something different.
    The Steelers beat the Falcons by putting pressure on Ryan from different parts of the field. Should we do something unusual and try the same thing.

    +2
    0
    Rating: +2. From 2 votes.
    Please wait...
  16. It was only 2 seasons ago that our defense played horribly, then came back after the bye and had turned the corner. We can all only hope this is the case this year. If not…I foresee screaming and celebrating on offense, then trying not to throw the controller at my screen on defense.

    +1
    0
    Rating: +1. From 1 vote.
    Please wait...
    • If you look at both teams defensively, we both have bad secondarys. The key will be the run game as Atlanta is also bad against the run, while we have been pretty stout over the first 4 games. We also look to be getting Beau Allen back in addition to getting Vita back last week, which should make for an even better run defense.

      It shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone that the key for us will be getting our own run game going and keeping their offense off the field. Unfortunately, I’ll be playing Jameis, DJax, and Sanu in fantasy this week so I’ll be torn about running or passing the whole game.

      0
      0
      No votes yet.
      Please wait...
  17. Great comments, guys! Enjoyed reading them – as always!

    0
    0
    No votes yet.
    Please wait...