When the amount of compelling data is overwhelming you must question the "official" story.If it were just 1 or 2 conflicting facts then I could justify discriminating against the conflicting data.1. Thermite found at ground zero. http://investigate911.org/, http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html, http://911review.com/evidence/wtc_explosives.html 2. Building 7 collapses without an observable action. http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-collapse-of-wtc-seven/15201, http://rememberbuilding7.org/7-facts-about-building-7/3. Evidence of related nefarious activities. http://killtown.911review.org/oddities/911.html 4. Eyewitness accounts explosions occur exactly like a demolition. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/eyewitnesses.html 5. Using our logical mind what would be the purpose for a domestic attack on their own country? Well, what was the reaction to the action? wire taps, surveillance, increased "security" at the expense of freedoms. So my answer is - CONTROL. They want it...and they want more of it. http://www.thepowerhour.com/news3/jfk_speech_transcript.htm "Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value of insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. "
