Has it slipped your mind who started this thread, Moonbeam? You still haven't managed to explain the invisible demolition crew. You can try to wriggle out of it all you want, but until you manage to explain the gaping holes in your theory, burden remains on you.
I would prefer an investigation to find out what happened. In lieu of that I will continue look for accountability from NIST. It's not up to me to explain what happened, you on the hand are hell bent on issuing anyone accountable a free pass.
So wait, NIST did an investigation. Their hard to understand theory is that is you carve 25% out of a building with a specific load distribution and then light it on fire bad things happen. THIS is hard for you to accept but guys blowing up a building with no one noticing them doing the raft of things that have to happen seems like not too much of a stretch. I mean how detached from reality do you have to get. Oh and BTW it is up to you to explain what happened. NIST explained it very nicely and using lots of science, engineering, math and crap you can't be bothered to try and understand.
Don't forget flying planes into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon to distract from the real goal of demolishing Building 7
I don't recall anyone else forcing Vin and Olaf to agree... well done
?
yea, it sucks, but you and Vin are on the same side of this one...
