No doubt you are the straw man Vinbot
lol:
This is the point where the usual pro gun guys will really go off with the nonsense . .. . .lmao, have fun
page 21 . . .lol
yawn . . ..
No gun, no death ....
"As the "straw man" metaphor suggests, the counterfeit position attacked in a Straw Man argument is typically weaker than the opponent's actual position, just as a straw man is easier to defeat than a flesh-and-blood one. Of course, this is no accident, but is part of what makes the fallacy tempting to commit, especially to a desperate debater who is losing an argument. Thus, it is no surprise that arguers seldom misstate their opponent's position so as to make it stronger. Of course, if there is an obvious way to make a debating opponent's position stronger, then one is up against an incompetent debater. Debaters usually try to take the strongest position they can, so that any change is likely to be for the worse. However, attacking a logically stronger position than that taken by the opponent is a sign of strength, whereas attacking a straw man is a sign of weakness."
This POS still is trying to say his words verbatim is a straw man argument? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POXZ_tJkiyw
I can predict the future:
Vindro Botticelli, spending hours and hours combing the web to bring you stories you're not interested in.
I guess that confirms you're interested in me then, because you keep commenting . . . . oh yeah . . wait . . .. I am forcing you to . . . its a spell . . . you're a victim . . you just don't know it. It's not really that you are a sad little troll who craves my attention . .. that's not why you keep posting . . you're a victim
ha, you did it . . you fell for it because I forced you to ......... so I could call you names . . . .lol .. . . . I kid
lol . .. the rest of the band o' misfits cannot be far behind . . .
No gun, no death ....
"As the "straw man" metaphor suggests, the counterfeit position attacked in a Straw Man argument is typically weaker than the opponent's actual position, just as a straw man is easier to defeat than a flesh-and-blood one. Of course, this is no accident, but is part of what makes the fallacy tempting to commit, especially to a desperate debater who is losing an argument. Thus, it is no surprise that arguers seldom misstate their opponent's position so as to make it stronger. Of course, if there is an obvious way to make a debating opponent's position stronger, then one is up against an incompetent debater. Debaters usually try to take the strongest position they can, so that any change is likely to be for the worse. However, attacking a logically stronger position than that taken by the opponent is a sign of strength, whereas attacking a straw man is a sign of weakness."
This POS still is trying to say his words verbatim is a straw man argument?
lol . . . . Buffy, you're beyond predictable . .. . .like I said, there are legitimate and HONEST pro-gun arguments out there . . the problem seems to be the messengers . . lol. Buffy, you are a great standard bearer for the cause . . . I need more people like you
Talking of straw arguments Vin, your we need to get rid of guns because more guns=more gun violence is top of the list.It goes without saying that by and large you get more of one thing, you get more of another.You get more cars, you get more road traffic accidents.You get more drunk people you get more fights.You get more knifes you get more knife violence.Technically speaking you could logically say if I get rid of A then therefore I will have less B. But it ignores the totality of the situation. It is the it is pink so it is a pig argument. For example all women who give birth to children with defects eat food while they are pregnant. Therefore logically if you stop women eating while they are pregnant, you get less children with defects. Whereas this is correct, are you obtaining the desired results. Less guns may = less gun violence per se, but does it obtain the desired results of less overall violence? Thus far you have not shown that. In fact there are more studies that show MORE guns in the hands of legitimate and responsible owners = LESS overall violence. Isn't that more desirable than simply patting ourselves on the back and saying "look we are more civilized because we don't have guns" while people drop like flies around us?
