I'm not pretending to post anything new, I'm posting valid questions that haven't been answered. If you want to call never releasing photos of the actual people the media claim took part in this, a conspiracy, have at it. I call it shady, because it is. Again, champ, why was it okay to release pictures of the dead killers in Columbine, but not now? You seem to be implying it's unreasonable to expect proof of something these days, funny considering in the GZ thread proof seemed to matter to you.
Your definition of "proof" is what is shady champ.lol
You're wrong...COMPLETELY wrong. I would tell you how wrong you are, but Amazing Atheist put it better than I ever could. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snViuRNT5Jk
"Amazing Atheist" is all I needed to see. Pass.
So watching Amazing Atheist is dumb but believing in a ridiculous and overly complicated government conspiracy isn't?
The way evolutionists believe life was created has been proven to be a mathematical impossibility. Your little atheist friend believes in it regardless. So, yes, I'll take "overly complicated" in favor of someone who believes in the impossible.
Let me make one thing clear...I don't believe in everything Amazing Atheist says. In fact there are plenty of times where I downright want to STRANGLE him as a devout theist. But I think the video I posted was alright and proved the conspiracy wrong. I say that 60% of the time he's right, and 40% he's flat out wrong. Can we agree to disagree, after all, it's not like I'm a HUGE Amazing Atheist fan, or even think he's a good, nice person. I just find him funny and for the most part pretty smart.
Okay, and I'll make something clear. I'm not saying this is a conspiracy in the sense that it didn't happen. I think there are many holes, many things that can't (and haven't) be explained, but outside of that I'm not sure what happened. Cops attempting to cover up the fact that another shooter or shooterS were responsible for this, wouldn't be too hard to believe or as you put it "overly complicated".
Alright, I suppose that's reasonable. Just be careful with threads like this, posting doubts about Sandy Hook is dangerous and WILL be interpreted by some in ways you don't want. I myself believe some crazy things; I have doubts about Osama's death, I think we have been visited by extra terrestrial life. That said, I usually keep these ideas relativley quiet so as to avoid sparking controversy. If I were you, I'd lock the thread and just have a PM conversation with some people willing to listen. I'm all ears about this as long as you have a good argument. I would never in a million years think this was faked, but you could have decent reasoning, I don't know. :)
You need to stop arguing with Vin, your "logic" is starting to mirror his. Photos or video surveillance of Adam Lanza at the school now no longer falls under the definition of proof? I really have to ask if you're being serious at this point.Tell me how you know Lanza was at the school, and was the killer.
Okay, and I'll make something clear. I'm not saying this is a conspiracy in the sense that it didn't happen. I think there are many holes, many things that can't (and haven't) be explained, but outside of that I'm not sure what happened. Cops attempting to cover up the fact that another shooter or shooterS were responsible for this, wouldn't be too hard to believe or as you put it "overly complicated".
There is always holes in these situations. That's why they called chaotic.
