You can say almost anything on television or Twitter . . but you cannot allege "fraud" in court without SPECIFIC PROOF . . because everyone would just vaguely claim fraud (like Trump is doing publicly).
This REALITY has absolutely crushed Trump in court, where all the credible law firms have now withdrawn and Trump is left only with Rudy Giuliani (aka "Hunter's Laptop!)
To say Rudy is having a tough go would be . . lol . . and understatement. This is from yesterday in PA:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/17/politics/trump-giuliani-election-lawsuit/index.html
"Instead, the judge listened patiently for hours on Tuesday in Williamsport, then lobbed tough questions to Giuliani and other Trump lawyers. The Trump campaign has made bold swings at President-elect Joe Biden's win in Pennsylvania, and the state's use of mail-in ballots, claiming that two voters in Lancaster and Fayette counties couldn't cure absentee ballots they cast with procedural mistakes in them, while those in other counties were allowed to correct ballot problems."
""You're alleging that the two individual plaintiffs were denied the right to vote," Brann asked the Trump campaign attorney at one point, "But at bottom, you're asking this court to invalidate more than 6.8 million votes, thereby disenfranchising every single voter in the Commonwealth. Could you tell me how this result could possibly be justified?"
LOL. IT GETS WORSE. HERE COMES THE "FRAUD" ISSUE:
"No, your honor, we are not" alleging fraud, Giuliani said, after Brann reminded him a newer version of the Trump campaign's lawsuit cut back those claims. It's a "fraudulent process," Giuliani continued.
"So you are alleging a fraud," the judge responded, noting that would require a higher standard than suspicion to bring a case."
ASKED WHY THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WAS EVEN IN THE FEDERAL COURT:
"The state courts are virtually closed to us now," Giuliani acknowledged to Brann, after receiving the state high court's ruling."
THE RULING HE REFERENCES:
"The Pennsylvania Supreme Court even added to the Trump campaign pile on, releasing an opinion just after Giuliani finished his opening arguments. The state's highest court essentially undercut Giuliani's argument to Brann that ballot processing observers had been treated so unfairly by Democratic-run city governments, they were entitled to a court's help."
*************************************
TRUMPETTES CONTINUE TO BE CONNED . . . or maybe not.
