Where does it say Schiano thought he was too little?
Did they not teach what "undersized" means at Stetson Law, Counselor?You ask for link, and when you get pwned yet again, you deny it's existence. The sky is blue, Counselor. Only you would try to argue it's not blue, it's cyan.
Lol that quote does not support your statement, but you know that. ...that's why you're throwing out all the "stupid" and "pwned" The comment you made originally is your ASSUMPTION. You then made it worse by posting PART of a comment by SR.... But the full comment does not even support your assumption. Neither do the vital stats for Teo (which is why you ignored them)Thanks for the laugh Buggsy
I have another link regarding Schiano wanting bigger DE's like Bowers, Counselor. This particular source is of the highest order, and I'm sure you'll agree - because it's you:
If the search feature on this website didn't start to suck out of nowhere, I would find you the links to Schiano stating the Bennett was let go because they wanted bigger DE's like Bowers and how Bowers was going to get 10+ sacks this season. These things were discussed extensively on this message board.
agree with the bigger DEs. How many sacks do the Lbs and safeties have this year
You were in agreement in September, but now are incredulous to the suggestion. Now, go ahead and argue with yourself Counselor.
I have another link regarding Schiano wanting bigger DE's like Bowers, Counselor. This particular source is of the highest order, and I'm sure you'll agree - because it's you:
If the search feature on this website didn't start to suck out of nowhere, I would find you the links to Schiano stating the Bennett was let go because they wanted bigger DE's like Bowers and how Bowers was going to get 10+ sacks this season. These things were discussed extensively on this message board.
agree with the bigger DEs. How many sacks do the Lbs and safeties have this year
You were in agreement in September, but now are incredulous to the suggestion. Now, go ahead and argue with yourself Counselor.
Lol, that has nothing to do with your comment, but I see you have now dialed it back to a "suggestion". You're letting your ego get the best of you. Look at your comment again. Oh, and Teo says high (why do you keep ignoring that -- lol)
Lol, that has nothing to do with your comment
No, of course not.Shameless.
I'm just an innocent bystander here but I have to admit that I chuckle everytime you address Vin as "counsellor".....what the heck is that all about?
I'm just an innocent bystander here but I have to admit that I chuckle everytime you address Vin as "counsellor".....what the heck is that all about?
He's a grease-ball lawyer. Which I'm sure nobody finds that hard to believe.
Lol, that has nothing to do with your comment
No, of course not.Shameless.
You made the comment citing me as a source? Lmao. Read your comment again ... Or don't. Lol.
ahhhhh.....got it.