“No huddle?” Beckles yelped. “With who? We don’t have that much talent. You expect that makeshift offensive line to block all game long? Then you don’t know much football.
“If you think they should run no-huddle all the time, you don’t know anything about football.”
It’s also worth noting the team ran more no/sugar huddle in yesterday’s game.
Beckles and his dumbass-duo really took it on the chin yesterday.
In other related news, the Earth is round.
Let me guess , play calling had nothing to do with the win or better execution?
play calling only matters when they lose . They win it’s because of Brady , they lose and it’s lefty’s fault .
Buggsy desperation lol
he says “all the time”
The Bucs routinely go no huddle be late because they are always behind. One reason is the “makeshift line”
Let me guess , play calling had nothing to do with the win or better execution?
Not sure how they won.
I was told Brady’s arm was washed.
Weird.
Let me guess , play calling had nothing to do with the win or better execution?
play calling only matters when they lose . They win it’s because of Brady , they lose and it’s lefty’s fault .
The aggressive attitude and changes in playcalling is what allowed the team to score 30 points. The OC implemented ideas (more aggressive deep calls, running less on first down, more uptempo, etc.) some of us have been asking for all year. Was it a perfectly called game? Of course not. The RZ playcalling still leaves quite a bit to be desired and we still saw route combos where three WR’s could have high-fived each other. But yesterday was progress.
You see how that works? Giving gives credit when they deserve it and criticism when they deserve it. What a novel concept.
Beckles is an ass who benefits by stirring things up but he’s absolutely right on this issue. If you think the Bucs o-line would hold up in a wide open, spread style offense (like JC suggested) you’re just blind and/or dumb.
if you think that’s true now because of the Panther game… ignoring all the games before …you’re really really blind and dumb.
the “makeshift line” played well yesterday (with both Wirfs and Smith back) against a 6-9 team with its 3rd qB and interim coach
but the Bucs won because of Brady and D
Let me guess , play calling had nothing to do with the win or better execution?
play calling only matters when they lose . They win it’s because of Brady , they lose and it’s lefty’s fault .
The aggressive attitude and changes in playcalling is what allowed the team to score 30 points. The OC implemented ideas (more aggressive deep calls, running less on first down, more uptempo, etc.) some of us have been asking for all year. Was it a perfectly called game? Of course not. The RZ playcalling still leaves quite a bit to be desired and we still saw route combos where three WR’s could have high-fived each other. But yesterday was progress.
You see how that works? Giving gives credit when they deserve it and criticism when they deserve it. What a novel concept.
Buggsy tell us all you were wrong without typing “I was wrong”
lmao “he changed”
bwhaha
The release time on the three deep balls were approx 2.6 seconds, 3.4 seconds, and 2.2 seconds respectively. Only football simpletons think you have to hold the ball for five seconds to throw deep. The OL played no differently yesterday than they have all year. Only Beckles and at least one of his dumbass duo think otherwise.
Thinnest skin ever. It’s football. If you watch the game AND YOURE EVEN MODESTLY HONEST … you’d see EXECUTION issues all over
rookie TEs with multiple drops
Rookie TE stood running so pass missed
Evans with early drop
Godwin fumbles
Leverett whiffs
Smith holding
Godwin Pass Interference
etc
Half the video from the game is Brady screaming and frustrated lol
If you think the Bucs o-line would hold up in a wide open, spread style offense (like JC suggested) you’re just blind and/or dumb.
The tape says they would. The grades say they would.
If you think the Bucs o-line would hold up in a wide open, spread style offense (like JC suggested) you’re just blind and/or dumb.
The tape says they would. The grades say they would.
OCT 2022
"Until now, the Buccaneers under Tom Brady had been the model of offensive consistency. In the past two seasons combined, they ranked fourth in points per drive (2.62) and could do everything. If you played two-high, they could run the ball with authority and pick you apart with underneath passes. If you got aggressive and manned them up, Brady could beat you deep with remarkable precision."
"In the past two seasons combined, the Bucs ranked ninth in EPA per rush (-0.01). This season, they are dead last (-0.2), and until last week, the Bucs continued to call unproductive first-down runs that put them behind the sticks. Although the Bucs have always had a very limited list of run-game concepts, they were able to gash opponents, especially when defenses took a safety out of the box. Without the threat of the run, linebackers and safeties aren’t biting up as hard when the Bucs call play-action, making it more difficult for Brady to hit crossing routes. One of the biggest dropoffs in the Bucs’ offsense this season has been their ability to hit explosive plays off of play-action on first down. Their explosive pass rate on first-down play-action has dropped from 25.8 percent over the past two seasons combined, which ranked third in the NFL, to 15.2 percent this year, which is tied for 26th."
"Additionally, defenses are sitting on routes because they aren’t afraid of the Bucs beating them deep. The interior of the Bucs’ line hasn’t been bad, but there’s been just enough interior pressure — Brady’s kryptonite — to force him to quickly get rid of the ball instead of waiting for deeper routes to develop. And the Bucs need that extra time because Mike Evans, their best deep threat, doesn’t win with pure speed. Just 28.9 percent of Brady’s throws this year have traveled 10 or more air yards, compared to 33.6 percent the past two seasons combined. He’s held the ball longer than three seconds on 12.8 percent of his throws this season, compared to 15.7 percent in 2021 and 18.1 percent in 2020.
Just looking at the numbers, things don’t add up — Brady’s pressure rate is the lowest that it’s been as a Buccaneer. But remember, quarterbacks are largely responsible for pressure rates, and Brady knows he has to adjust the game after losing three interior linemen. His response has been to speed up his process, but it’s reached the point that he’s rushing himself at times and does not look comfortable. Brady has never excelled under pressure, but last season his passer rating under pressure was 61.6; this season it’s 50.4."
*******
IF YOU READ THAT ARTICLE, which is based on a FILM REVIEW, you will see film excerpts of Bardy never getting to open WRs because he's been pushing the ball out so quickly BECAUSE OF STUFF LIKE THIS:
"Here, the Bucs have Scotty Miller, their only speed receiver in their 12 personnel package (one back, two tight ends, two receivers), add a deep threat to their play-action passing game. Evans ran a post to occupy the safety, while Miller ran a take-off route.
"Brady could have hit Miller deep with the safety flat-footed, and Otton was wide open after the defender on him fell down. Brady looked in their direction, but the play ended with Brady throwing the ball away."
"Up front, the Bucs were in a man protection, meaning Goedeke and Hainsey were responsible for the respective defensive tackles lined up on them.
"Before Brady could load up to throw, both players lost the rep. Hainsey was lucky he wasn’t called for a hold. Because of the pressure, the Bucs might have missed an opportunity for a long touchdown."
***********
DH, you are the "loudest" voice here that a) Brady is great (agreed) and b) Leftwich is THE problem ('a" problem), but now after a game with EXECUTION errors everywhere you're turning into JC and saying we have a great line that could actually play wide open lol . . when the stats you are relying on are largely BRADY . . something that should be obvious to the eye . . whether that be looking at the actual game OR just the lineups that have gone from Gronk to a ROOKIE, Marpet to . . etc
Kind of having it both ways . . right?
Holy shit, I didn’t realize the OL gave up a pressure in October. That changes everything.
The biggest problem with ignoramuses and idiots is they have no idea they are ignoramuses and idiots. They simply don’t realize how stupid the shit they say is. When you mix in a clinical lack of shame and self-awareness, you get the above asshole.
Holy shit, I didn’t realize the OL gave up a pressure in October. That changes everything.
The biggest problem with ignoramuses and idiots is they have no idea they are ignoramuses and idiots. They simply don’t realize how stupid the shit they say is. When you mix in a clinical lack of shame and self-awareness, you get the above asshole.
The irony of using a STRAWMAN ("I didn’t realize the OL gave up a pressure in October.") to support this:
"They simply don’t realize how stupid the shit they say is. "
"When you mix in a clinical lack of . . . self-awareness"
while arguing JCs and DH's point that the current O-line is good enough to play wide open passing offense.
(the point: for anyone with opposable thumbs . . .a lot of the criticism of Brady missing and some of the criticism of the offensive production comes down to the LINE and Brady coping with the "makeshift" LINE (the point of the example . . big word, Buggsy, look out . . above). A few of you are arguing that the line is great and we should open it up LMAO. Some of those same people are arguing for MORE Play Action Passing . . so go full spread with Brady in shotgun and open it up (ie give up on the run) . . but PLAY-ACTION PASS MORE? Posting yourself in circles, lol. Especially after a game where the Bucs gave up a big pass and a big PI penalty that led to a TD in the first series BECAUSE they were struggling to deal with a team that "just ran for 300 yards")
When you mix in a clinical lack of shame and self-awareness . .. you get the above asshole.
Buggsy . . did you or did you not post here that there was NO CORRELATION BETWEEN RUNNING and PASSING in the NFL?"
you will not answer that question honestly and THAT is the point, the very reason I highlighted your hilarious quote
