Ran a 4.31 today , adjusted back to 4.43 . Speed in space. YAC potential . Dynamic kick returner. Exactly what we need. Forget the slow TE's in this class . If this guy is available in round 2 ?? ( which he could be because of the depth of the WR class ) Crown our ass. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jZbGUMevcI
Already one on the front page
One is not enough , watched boy . Not enough !!
Ive said it a while ago, I acutally think Beckham is what the Bucs need at WR more than any other receiver in the entire draft. What I dont get is how the rest of the Bucs fans dont quite see it yet.
If Beckham makes it to our second round pick that'd be awesome
Ran a 4.31 today , adjusted back to 4.43 . Speed in space. YAC potential . Dynamic kick returner. Exactly what we need. Forget the slow TE's in this class . If this guy is available in round 2 ?? ( which he could be because of the depth of the WR class ) Crown our ass.
whoa whoa whoa. Wasn't **CENSORED** adjusted anywhere. He ran a 4.43 (not that there is anything wrong with that, that is still fast). If I understand correctly, all NFLN's "unofficial" times were just those coming from Charley Casserly's stopwatch, and the official ones are the electronic timed results. Am I mistaken in that? If so, just means Charley sucks with his stopwatch. Not that the mean old combine is cheating some prospects out of faster times.
Anyone notice how fast his 20yard shuttle was? Watkins was actually pretty slow in comparison. Teddy Bridgewater ran a faster 20 yard shuttle than Watkins
Ran a 4.31 today , adjusted back to 4.43 . Speed in space. YAC potential . Dynamic kick returner. Exactly what we need. Forget the slow TE's in this class . If this guy is available in round 2 ?? ( which he could be because of the depth of the WR class ) Crown our ass.
whoa whoa whoa. Wasn't **CENSORED** adjusted anywhere. He ran a 4.43 (not that there is anything wrong with that, that is still fast). If I understand correctly, all NFLN's "unofficial" times were just those coming from Charley Casserly's stopwatch. Am I mistaken in that? If so, just means Charley sucks with his stopwatch. Not that the mean old combine is cheating some prospects out of faster times.
4.43 is still fast. Its actually exactly what I predicted on this board that he'd run. but everyone was hyping him up to be 4.3 speed for sure. I dont like the idea of picking a WR in the top 10, and I especially don't like the idea of picking a receiver who doesnt crack 6'1" and wouldnt run away from every defense he plays against. if he ran a real 4.3 Id say ok, he's going to be the fastest guy on teh field nearly every game but that not the case, and i didnt think it was. The value is bad. We could take Greg Robinson in the first and Beckham, Cooks, or Lee in the second.
4.43 is still fast. Its actually exactly what I predicted on this board that he'd run. but everyone was hyping him up to be 4.3 speed for sure. I dont like the idea of picking a WR in the top 10, and I especially don't like the idea of picking a receiver who doesnt crack 6'1" and wouldnt run away from every defense he plays against. if he ran a real 4.3 Id say ok, he's going to be the fastest guy on teh field nearly every game but that not the case, and i didnt think it was. The value is bad. We could take Greg Robinson in the first and Beckham, Cooks, or Lee in the second.
Oh hell yeah it is. Especially for a human of his size. Despite being a crap beverage you know your shit bro. I would be thrilled with your scenario (I still think Watkins is a fabulous prospect but have really cooled on him at 7 given the quality and depth of talent I'm seeing at the position). That is where we got those unofficial times though isn't it? I swear that's what Rich said at one point.
Ran a 4.31 today , adjusted back to 4.43 . Speed in space. YAC potential . Dynamic kick returner. Exactly what we need. Forget the slow TE's in this class . If this guy is available in round 2 ?? ( which he could be because of the depth of the WR class ) Crown our ass.
whoa whoa whoa. Wasn't **CENSORED** adjusted anywhere. He ran a 4.43 (not that there is anything wrong with that, that is still fast). If I understand correctly, all NFLN's "unofficial" times were just those coming from Charley Casserly's stopwatch. Am I mistaken in that? If so, just means Charley sucks with his stopwatch. Not that the mean old combine is cheating some prospects out of faster times.
4.43 is still fast. Its actually exactly what I predicted on this board that he'd run. but everyone was hyping him up to be 4.3 speed for sure. I dont like the idea of picking a WR in the top 10, and I especially don't like the idea of picking a receiver who doesnt crack 6'1" and wouldnt run away from every defense he plays against. if he ran a real 4.3 Id say ok, he's going to be the fastest guy on teh field nearly every game but that not the case, and i didnt think it was. The value is bad. We could take Greg Robinson in the first and Beckham, Cooks, or Lee in the second.
Agreed. As much as I like Sammy it's kind of dumb to take a WR in the top 10 when this WR class is as deep as it is and we have so many needs.Man , I want Odell though. I just know he is going to be good in this league. Hoping teams target the big Benjamin type guys in round 1 and let Beckham fall to 2.
4.43 is still fast. Its actually exactly what I predicted on this board that he'd run. but everyone was hyping him up to be 4.3 speed for sure. I dont like the idea of picking a WR in the top 10, and I especially don't like the idea of picking a receiver who doesnt crack 6'1" and wouldnt run away from every defense he plays against. if he ran a real 4.3 Id say ok, he's going to be the fastest guy on teh field nearly every game but that not the case, and i didnt think it was. The value is bad. We could take Greg Robinson in the first and Beckham, Cooks, or Lee in the second.
Oh hell yeah it is. Especially for a human of his size. Despite being a crap beverage you know your **CENSORED** bro. I would be thrilled with your scenario (I still think Watkins is a fabulous prospect but have really cooled on him at 7 given the quality and depth of talent I'm seeing at the position). That is where we got those unofficial times though isn't it? I swear that's what Rich said at one point.
You run twice though and you only get one official time , so it's also something to do with putting both times together....I don't think anyone knows for sure how the hell it works , even the commentators on NFL Network don't seem to know.
Gotta love idiots arguing over 2/100ths of a second. It takes five times longer than that to blink.
Love Beckham, can't see any way he makes it to us at the top of R2 though. Not even sure about Cooks now. Matthews seems like a more likely candidate.