I said it was a racist trope. Maybe look up why I included trope.
why was it not?
How was it racist trope, Vin?
It played to a common theme (trope) thats playing out right here on the board, the idea that a black man (Bowles) was hired/or retained for a reason ("optics") other than the content of his character (qualification as a coach). Worse than that - in an almost cartoon-like fashion - you credited it to an ANONYMOUS SOURCE. That is, in and of itself, a very common racial issue, the idea that the story you are conveying is true because of a person who shall remain nameless. Theres a name for that too. lol
That's why said identify the source then, to give it context, because you used it to add credibility.
You have suggested your intent was not to post a racist trope, intent, but never explained what you meant. . . . despite MULTIPLE OPPORTUNITIES, including this one again lol. Just a lot of the usual chickenspit name calling
Thats on you, not me.
"I spoke to a person who should know and that person says DH is ______"
"I golf with a guy connected to the FO and he says Bowles is _____"
How can anyone defend such an EPIC ending to a season that began with so much promise.
Crazy that there are still a few on here that do.
Wild.
Name them?
I see mostly racism (DEI) and angst and I don't think there is a single person here defending the players or the coaches? Maybe defending Licht, but you defend Licht right?
So who are you two talking about?
This is my post from the other day in the RE:Gut Feeling thread
"Well that is fucking woke. Let's focus on whether he's a below average HC, average HC, or above average HC. The record is 35-36. That is below average. Black, white, green, yellow, whatever, he's fucking blah."
My point was let's evaluate Bowles based on his record and performance, not the color of his skin. People should not be placed in positions based on Diversity, Equity, or Inclusion.
How can anyone defend such an EPIC ending to a season that began with so much promise.
Crazy that there are still a few on here that do.
Wild.
Name them?
I see mostly racism (DEI) and angst and I don't think there is a single person here defending the players or the coaches? Maybe defending Licht, but you defend Licht right?
So who are you two talking about?
This is my post from the other day in the RE:Gut Feeling thread
"Well that is fucking woke. Let's focus on whether he's a below average HC, average HC, or above average HC. The record is 35-36. That is below average. Black, white, green, yellow, whatever, he's fucking blah."
My point was let's evaluate Bowles based on his record and performance, not the color of his skin. People should not be placed in positions based on Diversity, Equity, or Inclusion.
right I saw that post but my question was who is defending the epic collapse?
I see only people saying time to move on etc
