Why don't people want to give Revis another year to prove himself as they do with Glennon?
Why don't people want to give Revis another year to prove himself as they do with Glennon?
People are calling the Bucs for just that reason. :o
The Bucs front office seriously needs to consider restructuring Revis, mainly with the purpose of getting him at a fan-friendly cap number.
you're on a roll
The Bucs front office seriously needs to consider restructuring Revis, mainly with the purpose of getting him at a fan-friendly cap number.
you're on a roll
Do you think the cap numbers will be that ugly font?
Why hasn't this thread been deleted entirely? Revis should not go anywhere nor should he be considered to be traded at all. The Bucs just got the guy last year and they got him under his assumption that he would get his 16 a year. If they ask him to restructure he will be less inclined to want to play for the team at all. Some of the same people who wanted him last year now want to consider getting rid of him. That's pretty ridiculous.
The Bucs front office seriously needs to consider restructuring Revis, mainly with the purpose of getting him at a fan-friendly cap number.
you're on a roll
Do you think the cap numbers will be that ugly font?
if so, will it blink?
The Bucs front office seriously needs to consider restructuring Revis, mainly with the purpose of getting him at a fan-friendly cap number.
you're on a roll
Am I?
We will all be on a roll in a week.
Im just a simple guy from a small town, hoping that we make fan-friendly moves...
Im just a simple guy from a small town, hoping that we make fan-friendly moves...
You running for president? Sounds like it. Lol
Im just a simple guy from a small town, hoping that we make fan-friendly moves...
Is that you, Johnny?
I must misunderstand something
vinpossible.
gg chace
Im just a simple guy from a small town, hoping that we make fan-friendly moves...
You running for president? Sounds like it. Lol
Or... I'm a 5'11 QB with limited passing skills, a slight frame, and real concerns regarding commitment, who is trying to pull the wool over your eyes with flashy play and good ol' boy relatability....working?
Im just a simple guy from a small town, hoping that we make fan-friendly moves...
You running for president? Sounds like it. Lol
Or... I'm a 5'11 QB with limited passing skills, a slight frame, and real concerns regarding commitment, who is trying to pull the wool over your eyes with flashy play and good ol' boy relatability....working?
Yea that's Johnny
its the same take home cash plus more time though? that's the trade off, cap relief for more time.not a contract/cap guy so I could certainly be wrong
It's not a cap issue. It's a value issue. The team can absorb the cap hit. The question is can they absorb paying the player this much over current market value.
It's none of that according to this story. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000330718/article/offseason-forecast-tampa-bay-buccaneers Though Lovie's quotes say more man less zone so there's conflicting info. http://thepewterplank.com/2014/02/26/lovie-smith-buccaneers-will-win-and-lose-with-revis-defense-man-coverage/
None of that in what way? It's exactly what I said. I think the "scheme" issue is completely overblown but the first comment in the nfl.com article focuses on the value of the contract. That's the issue.
"Tampa Bay expected to play more zone than man, Revis simply isn't an optimal fit."
Presented as an afterthought to the value issue and you say it's "none of that"?
