Also Evans asterisk? The man played 14 games!
Glad they ran a clear-out route for the #1 WR.
Way to keep a 2 season troll going ginger
Just curious, you sack of shit. Who, exactly, am I trolling by calling Mike Evans a #1 WR?
It’s going to be tough for your dumbass to double-talk your way out of this. But you’re a shameless gasbag, so you’ll string-post away.
and "your" a coward too? . . .thats okay. you trolling here is probably the better alternative
Was there an answer in there about who is being trolled by calling Mike Evans a #1 WR?
Of course not. Because you’re a clueless, double-talking gas bag.
Ive shit on Licht but he’s built a great OL.
You ignored the question for obvious reasons, so I’ll pose it again:
What is different about last year's OL vs. this year's OL? You don't think Barton is that good and the only other difference is Bredesen - who is the weakest player of the five.
Meaning, how do you ignore Coen's role in their playing (significantly) better, i.e. scheme, ability to be multiple in the run game, and his OL coach?
Mauch went from an F to a B, Goedeke went from a B to an A.
White is an F and Bucky is an A
So your answer is that your completely ignore Coen’s role in the OL’s improvement. How predictable.
Glad they ran a clear-out route for the #1 WR.
Way to keep a 2 season troll going ginger
Just curious, you sack of shit. Who, exactly, am I trolling by calling Mike Evans a #1 WR?
It’s going to be tough for your dumbass to double-talk your way out of this. But you’re a shameless gasbag, so you’ll string-post away.
and "your" a coward too? . . .thats okay. you trolling here is probably the better alternative
Was there an answer in there about who is being trolled by calling Mike Evans a #1 WR?
Of course not. Because you’re a clueless, double-talking gas bag.
Biggs you couldn't even own your own RB1 troll when it was right there IN PRINT so I am not going to waste my time trying to get you to own this nonsense you freaking lame as troll
roflmao way to WALK RIGHT INTO THAT ONE
The O-line is significantly better. 1) Goedeke significantly improved 2) 2) Barton is an improvement at C, 3) Mauch improved. 4)Bredeson is at least a slight improvement. This wasn't their best game, possibly their worst, but if it wasn't for the dominant O-line establishing the running game then we wouldn't be singing the praises of Coen. Coen is doing a great job, but none of it would be possible if we didn't have the O-line we have.Ive shit on Licht but he’s built a great OL.
You ignored the question for obvious reasons, so I’ll pose it again:
What is different about last year's OL vs. this year's OL? You don't think Barton is that good and the only other difference is Bredesen - who is the weakest player of the five.
Meaning, how do you ignore Coen's role in their playing (significantly) better, i.e. scheme, ability to be multiple in the run game, and his OL coach?
Why are you guys holding on to all this shit?
Let it go
So your answer is that your completely ignore Coen’s role in the OL’s improvement. How predictable.
So, according the cosplay GM, 2 of those players grades vastly improved.
Wonder if the coaching had anything to do with it.
From the Most Disappointing article
"the Bucs offense was called for a heavy dose of them, especially on a drive that carried into the fourth quarter. Ben Bredeson, Sterling Shepard, and Payne Durham were each called for penalties that set the team back 20 yards, and it was just another obstacle for them to overcome.
Nine of the 11 flags thrown on Tampa Bay were called on offense"
Come on, Seattle.
Glad they ran a clear-out route for the #1 WR.
Way to keep a 2 season troll going ginger
Just curious, you sack of shit. Who, exactly, am I trolling by calling Mike Evans a #1 WR?
It’s going to be tough for your dumbass to double-talk your way out of this. But you’re a shameless gasbag, so you’ll string-post away.
and "your" a coward too? . . .thats okay. you trolling here is probably the better alternative
Was there an answer in there about who is being trolled by calling Mike Evans a #1 WR?
Of course not. Because you’re a clueless, double-talking gas bag.
Biggs you couldn't even own your own RB1 troll when it was right there IN PRINT so I am not going to waste my time trying to get you to own this nonsense you freaking lame as troll
roflmao way to WALK RIGHT INTO THAT ONE
Was there an answer in there about who is being trolled by calling Mike Evans a #1 WR?
Of course not. Because you’re a clueless, double-talking gas bag.
Seattle takes the initial lead.
7-0.
Seattle takes the initial lead.
7-0.
honestly I do not care who we play
if we play like today we are one and done and if we do our best we can beat anyone
what I would like to see is ravens steelers on the other side 😀
Seattle takes the initial lead.
7-0.
honestly I do not care who we play
if we play like today we are one and done and if we do our best we can beat anyone
we may be one and done anyway, but I would expect us to perform better than today, especially if we are a heavy dog
