The Pewter Report Bucs Monday Mailbag is exclusively sponsored by SimBull – the stock market for sports that allows you to trade sports teams like stocks and earn cash payouts when your teams win.
SimBull has blended sports and the stock market to offer you a new way to invest in and profit off your favorite teams. Use your sports knowledge to buy low, sell high, and earn cash payouts when your teams win. Join the 2000+ early adopters who have started to invest in their favorite teams. The Stock Market for Sports is just a tap away – create a free account in seconds and start profiting from your sports knowledge!
The Pewter Report Bucs Monday Mailbag is where Mark Cook answers your questions from our @PewterReport Twitter account. You can submit your question to the Mailbag each week via Twitter using the hashtag #PRMailbag. Here are the questions we chose for this week’s edition of the Pewter Report’s Bucs Monday Mailbag.
Table of Contents
Question: How did the Bucs keep Shaq Barrett?
Answer: Shaquil Barrett has been re-signed by the Buccaneers on a four-year, $72 million deal that includes $36 million in guaranteed money, according to ESPN’s Adam Schefter. That’s an average of $18 million per year, but the deal is actually worth $17 million per season with escalators pushing the contract to $18 million if Barrett gets 15 sacks in a season and the team makes the playoffs. Even more important is that Barrett’s 2021 cap value is only $5.6 million, which helps the team’s efforts to re-sign tight end Rob Gronkowski and defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh.
Josina Anderson received a text message from Barrett at noon stating he was coming back to Tampa Bay, and his contract details were made available soon thereafter. Barrett commented on a Tom Brady Instagram post recently, clearly showing he would like to stay in Tampa Bay.
While his sack numbers were down from the 19.5 sacks he had as a Pro Bowler in 2019, Barrett did record eight sacks in the regular season and was second in the NFL in quarterback pressures in 2020. He added four more sacks in the postseason, including a monster three-sack game against the Packers.
When the dust settled, I think the Buccaneers understood the value of Barrett to the team’s Super Bowl run and how hard it is to replace a player of Barrett’s caliber, and they found a way to reach an agreement. And if you have paid attention to the way the Bucs have structured deals with Brady and linebacker Lavonte David, it appeared as if they were setting things up to be able to being Barrett back, which they ultimately did.
UPDATED 1:30 p.m. ET – Barrett’s deal calls for $1.25 million base salary in 2021 and an $18.75 million signing bonus that is prorated over five years. Barrett’s contract has a voidable fifth year.
Question: Aren’t you a little worried the Bucs are ditching their salary cap diligence a bit too freely of late? It looks like like a few players are going to be eating up an awfully large chunk of the next couple of years salary cap just to make a little bit more room this year. I know the meme is to “keep the band together,” but at what point does it become reckless? Having watched the 2002 crew disband due to salary cap issues, I really don’t want to see all our best players disappear again in two years because we mortgaged the future.
Answer: I also remember the post-Super Bowl purge that took place in the years following Tampa Bay’s first Super Bowl win after the 2002 season. Yet I don’t think this is a repeat of that. First and foremost, director of football operations Mike Greenberg could teach classes to many other GMs on how to navigate the salary cap and how to stay out of trouble. Greenberg’s knowledge and ability to fit the pieces together, with an eye to the future, is head and shoulders over former general managers Rich McKay and Bruce Allen.
I see where they might be some concern with the voidable years with the Lavonte David and Tom Brady deals, but even if David never plays another down after two more seasons, his dead cap is minimal with only approximately $6 million spread out the following three seasons. Brady’s hit will be higher if he retires after the 2022 season, but there are also ways to reduce that number between now and then by converting some of it to different bonuses as well. And with the salary cap set to explode for 2022 with a new TV contract that could double the current one, the Bucs will be in solid shape moving forward.
Question: Who are the three or four players who lead this team with their attitudes? How hard would it be to disrupt that chemistry if the Bucs draft a real bad apple?
Answer: The COVID-19 pandemic really did reporters a big disservice this year as we has zero in-person contact with players and coaches. Even when attending home games, all media sessions were conducted virtually and no reporters were allowed in the locker room at One Buccaneer Place or at Raymond James Stadium. We missed the opportunity to have those one-on-one’s with players during open locker room or Pewter Report events that we often had players or from office members attend. Those were prime opportunities to really get behind the scenes of the football team and gauge the pulse of the locker room. So as far as the players who were the leaders in 2020, it is hard to give an accurate answer, just because we didn’t get to witness it first hand.
Still I don’t think anyone needed to be in the locker room to know that Tom Brady had a huge impact on this team from a leadership standpoint and with his attitude. It rubbed off on a lot of players and no one wanted to be the guy to disappoint Brady. It all started there and trickled down. Jason Pierre-Paul was a player we saw lead the previous couple seasons but as great as he has been, he just couldn’t will the Bucs to wins the way Brady did.
As far as disrupting chemistry from a rookie, that just isn’t going to happen. Aside from Brady there are players like Mike Evans, Ryan Jensen, Rob Gronkowski, Devin White and Lavonte David who just wouldn’t allow that to occur. And besides the leadership and examples set from those players I mentioned, general manager Jason Licht and his staff won’t bring in players that they even suspect could be a bad apple.
They don’t need to gamble and take a chance on someone like that. That’s an advantage to be being a Super Bowl winning team – there aren’t a lot of holes to fill. And the front office can be pickier in who they choose. I suspect anyone who they have an inkling might have an attitude issue gets removed from their draft board entirely.
Question: Could there be a surprise or two in free agency? Either a player who does not come back, or a player that would be a “wow” signing? With the cap the way it is, I could see either or both happening.
Answer: I think there is always a chance of a surprise player. I didn’t foresee running back Leonard Fournette coming aboard last season, and was floored when the Buccaneers took a chance on Antonio Brown. So always expect the unexpected. With the salary cap being lower there will be some really good, bigger named players floating around without a team over the next month, but that same salary cap issue will likely keep the Bucs from making many – if any – “wow” moves initially.
Right now, at least this first week of free agency, the main focus will be on retaining as many of their own free agents as possible, then begin looking for pieces that fit the locker room and the salary cap. But I wouldn’t be shocked if by the time the season kicks off in September that we don’t see a coupl