Mb Nfl Lock Of The Szn Pewter 728x90 Jpg

Whether you agree with their methods or not (or fall somewhere in between like me), Pro Football Focus is at its’ core a player evaluation site that carries major weight in the sports media industry. For this reason it is always noteworthy when they release their 101 best players from the NFL season, with four Bucs making the 2020 list.

Quarterback Tom Brady unsurprisingly led the way, with a fourth-place finish amongst all players for the 2020 season. PFF grading has been a little bit higher on Brady than more advanced metrics were all regular season long, and Brady’s play in the playoffs proved their methodology to be pretty sound. I think quarterback evaluations are the position group that most lends itself to PFF’s grading methods, so I do put a good amount of stock in their results at that position at the end of each year. Brady landing at No. 4 overall, despite not making PFF’s top 101 a year ago, is nothing short of remarkable.

Rookie offensive tackle Tristan Wirfs was the second Buc to crack the list, coming in at No. 69 overall. According to PFF, Wirfs had nine games this season where he allowed one or fewer pressures. I really believe he was the second best player on the Bucs team this season, so seeing him recognized this way by PFF is very accurate.

Ten spots after Wirfs was left guard Ali Marpet, who did struggle at times in the playoffs, but was one of the best guards in football during the regular season. Marpet allowed zero sacks and just ten pressures in 13 games during the regular season, while also providing the best run blocking of his career. I would have called Marpet the second best Buc after Brady before the postseason, but Wirfs superior play in the playoffs gives him the slight edge. Both offensive linemen were elite this season.

The last Buc to make PFF’s Top 101 was linebacker Lavonte David, who slots in at No. 93. David missed a few more tackles than normal this season, but his ability in coverage remains elite at a position without many great coverage players. David’s ranking did fall from his 36th place finish after the 2019 season, but his play in my eyes remained relatively the same. He was easily the Bucs best and most consistent defender this season.

Wide receiver Mike Evans was identified in another PFF article as just missing the cut, largely due to the fact that he played a chunk of the season noticeably hurt. I agree with that assessment from PFF, as this was clearly not Evans best season, but he was still good enough to warrant strong consideration for the final 101. He and Chris Godwin’s grades were very similar on the year, and I would expect them both to bounce back with healthier, more consistent campaigns in 2021.

It should be noted that Antonio Brown, O.J. Howard and especially Vita Vea graded high enough to qualify for the Top 101, but didn’t play enough snaps to make the final list.

On defense, Shaq Barrett and Jamel Dean couldn’t have been far off PFF’s top 101 based on their final grades, as both graded well for the analytical website this past season. While Devin White was sensational from Week 15 on, it wasn’t enough to make up for his poor grading through most of the regular season. I don’t agree with PFF’s graded evaluation of White, but I also don’t think he was a top 101 player in the league when taking the whole year into consideration. Next season, however? Look out.

How about Jason Pierre-Paul, the Bucs lone Pro Bowler this season? PFF liked him, didn’t love him, and graded him as such. Not a top 101 consideration. I agree.

As for Carlton Davis, his absence from consideration represents one of my struggles with PFF player grades: they don’t take into account the difficulty of assignment within the scheme, or the difficulty of the individual matchup. For example, every Bucs fan knows Davis was better than Dean this season, but Dean grades higher for PFF. That’s because Davis is constantly matched up against No. 1 receivers on an island, and rarely is even given safety help over the top, with the Bucs predominantly playing as a single-high team all season long.

Given those facts, and the Bucs mis-use of Davis as a zone or off-man corner for much of the year when he is FAR superior in press-man situations, I think his PFF grade is probably least representative of his current level of play than any Buccaneers player who suited up this season. That’s ok, too. It’s difficult to numerically quantify every variable that should be considered in sports, that’s why PFF grades, like all numbers and stats, are most helpful in context with what tape shows us – and Davis’ tape showed a star-in-the-making this season.

Share On Socials

About the Author: Jon Ledyard

Jon Ledyard is PewterReport.com's newest Bucs beat writer and has experience covering the Pittsburgh Steelers as a beat writer and analyzing the NFL Draft for several draft websites, including The Draft Network. Follow Ledyard on Twitter at @LedyardNFLDraft
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RW
RW
7 months ago

This objective analysis shows guys like White and Barrett , although good players, aren’t the best in the NFL at their position. And we should keep that in mind with Barrett’s contract demands. And it shows Marpet and Wirfs are the keys to the Oline and Smith and Jensen are replaceable based on performance and salary.
Sometimes to keep winning a team must make tough decisions especially when the salary cap is going down.

ColdDeckEd
Reply to  RW
7 months ago

Lists like these are very much subjective. And their analysis, while detailed, I feel is pretty subjective as well.

RW
RW
Reply to  ColdDeckEd
7 months ago

CDEd do you know what PFF is? Silly of you to call this subjective when their analysis is used by all 32 NFL teams. It’s the most comprehensive and objective analysis in the sport.

hamilton
Reply to  RW
7 months ago

Bullshit

RW
RW
Reply to  hamilton
7 months ago

BS because you are too dumb to understand it?

Hockey Duckie
Reply to  RW
7 months ago

Although PFF is comprehensive, it is not objective because each evaluator doesn’t grade the exact same way despite sharing the same rubric evaluations. Some evaluators carry more bias on some aspect than others.
This is the same for all companies and educational systems. Ever heard of talk amongst classmates on which professor/teacher to take because they’re easier in that subject? Both professors/teachers are qualified in their field, but why do classmates prefer one over the other?

RW
RW
Reply to  Hockey Duckie
7 months ago

Duckie , it’s all relative. Any analysis or test has some subjectivity but for pro football their analysis is objective as it can get. And it goes a lot deeper than looking a at a bunch of basic stats like sacks and saying a guy is good or not. And it’s a hell of a lot better than some fans take after a superbowl win or loss.

plopes808
Reply to  RW
7 months ago

Jensen is definitely NOT replaceable and D Smith actually played well this year. If he can perform that way consistently he will join the rest of the Oline as irreplaceable.

RW
RW
Reply to  plopes808
7 months ago

Why do you say he’s not replaceable? Jensen is a good lineman who is one of the highest paid at his position. In a declining salary cap he either renegotiates his contract or they find someone cheaper. Or would you rather have Jensen than Barrett, Godwin or David?

owlykat
Reply to  plopes808
7 months ago

That will continue as long as Brady is here and who gave all his Offensive Line when he came here expensive watches as gifts and by winning the Super Bowl D. Smith gets a nice Super Bowl ring as well! Bet he would like a second ring next year too!

Dave
Reply to  RW
7 months ago

You’re saying how valid pff’s grades are. Yet Devin White was rated a 46 in the regular season. Which would have put him near the bottom of the league among all defenders. Find me a single coach in this league, that would rank him as a bottom of the barrel defensive player. Even in the postseason, he was only graded as a 68. His splash plays, pass rushing prowess, and sideline to sideline ability as a tackler, more than makes up for his deficiencies as a coverage LB, and at times, over aggressive tackling habits. This team isn’t winning a… Read more »

Last edited 7 months ago by Dave
owlykat
7 months ago

While being a big critic of D. Smith this year, he has improved his play this year to really protect Brady.

SufferingSince76
Reply to  owlykat
7 months ago

We saw what Smith can do when properly motivated, i.e playoffs. The question is how to motivate him during the regular season.

scubog
7 months ago

Being a bit “old school” and having watched every play of Buccaneer football; I don’t need to rely on some statistic or the dubious opinion of some unknown person behind a computer screen. Not that it doesn’t count for something. I prefer to go by what I see in the actual game. An example is #50. Double V doesn’t show up when I “check the sheet” as referenced by Winston on his way out the door, but his play is very impactful as we all know. Likewise we had a guy named Barret Ruuuuuud who made a lot of tackles……….but… Read more »

RW
RW
Reply to  scubog
7 months ago

Scubog you know that in the PFF system VV was the top rated defensive player on the Bucs this year. And if the team had an unlimited funds you keep everybody; but with a declining salary cap some guys will be released and others will have to take a pay cut if they want to stay.

Mb Nfl Lock Of The Szn Pewter 728x90 Jpg