Sikkema’s Stat of the Week

I believe the game of football is so popular because it can relate to those who choose to enjoy it on any level of its complexity. If you just like observing casually, appreciating when a dynamic, long play happens that results in points, you can do so and not get much below the surface at to why it happened the way it did and instead just enjoy it for what you just witnessed. But, on the other hand, there are levels of cause and effect that can go just about as deep as you want, all the way to intangible levels, for why plays, points and results come about the way they do in football.

At whatever level you choose to enjoy or understand, it’s fair to know that when you can keep things as simple as you can while still having success, you do that. That’s why the old phrase “it’s all about what happens in the trenches” is true. When you win in areas that are closest to the football, you’re probably going to be successful. This is also why the staple of the game comes from running the football.

Think about it, even in an age where passing is more central to point-scoring in 2018, there are so many moving parts in a successful pass play. There has to be good blocking for an extended period of time, which involves chemistry and talent. There there has to be the correct play call combined with the correct talent. The ball has to be released in the air, making it completely unguarded, and it has to be timed correctly to get it to a fellow offensive player with no bumps in the road. There’s a lot that goes into that.

You know what goes into running the football? Handing the ball to someone and him running with it.

This is why the run game was such an emphasis when football was in its infancy. The best players were trained to be running backs, and the players that had size, strength and athleticism were trained to be the offensive linemen. They could control the game because they had so much, well, control over what happened with the ball. They could keep it simple and still score enough points to win. But that’s no longer the case.

Since 2010, the league has averaged more than 22 points per team per game in each regular season. Before that, to find a single season in which the league averaged over 22 points per team per game you’d have to go all the way back to 1965. Since 2010, the league has averaged 0.77 rushing touchdowns per team per game. Before 2010, there were only four seasons, 2007, 2001, 1997 and 1992, in which the league averaged less than that going all the way back to 1938. In fact, between 1938 and 2010, most of the seasons recorded had teams finishing with an average above one rushing touchdown per team per game, which comes out to about four more rushing touchdowns per team per season. The points total is up but the rushing totals are down. Why? Because when a team emphasizes running the football over honing its passing attack as the emphasis and making the running game instead more of a compliment, it can’t keep up.

Contract numbers reflect this, too – remember, you can tell what a team really believes in by where it puts its money. People can lie, smokescreen, and say whatever they want, but when it comes to putting money on the line, those with money don’t like putting it in places they don’t think they will get a positive return on investment. This chart from FiveThirtyEight explains that, as the salary cap has gone up, and thus the numbers for most positional contracts with it, running back contracts have actually gone down.

(via FiveThirtyEight)

As you can see, almost every other position up to the year 2015 had increased pay in terms of amount overall except for running backs. Since then, the safety position has also declined, but even those contracts aren’t as much of a widespread downgrade like it has been for running backs.

So what gives? Running the ball still matters. I mean, there’s a reason why almost every team in the NFL hands the ball off on their first play of the game. It’s simple, and if it works, why go away from it? There’s no way it just stopped working. Well, no, it didn’t stop working, per se, but its efficiency has shifted as the game has evolved into more of a passing league. Two stats that tell us that are: marginal efficiency and marginal explosiveness.

Marginal Efficiency: the difference between a player’s success rate* (passing, rushing, or receiving) or success rate allowed (for an individual defender) and the expected success rate of each play based on down, distance, and yard line.

Marginal Explosiveness: the difference between a player’s IsoPPP** (passing, rushing, or receiving) or IsoPPP allowed (for an individual defender) and the expected IsoPPP value of each play based on down, distance, and yard line.

For offensive players, the larger the positive value, the better.

* Success rate: a common Football Outsiders tool used to measure efficiency by determining whether every play of a given game was successful or not. The terms of success in college football: 50 percent of necessary yardage on first down, 70 percent on second down, and 100 percent on third and fourth down.

** IsoPPP: the average equivalent point value of successful plays only.

DEFINITIONS VIA SB NATION

Bill Connelly of SB Nation does a lot of really great work with numbers and advanced analytics to try to bring context into decision making. Before the draft this year, Bill used the marginal efficiency and marginal explosiveness databases to explain why it’s not really logical to take a running back high in the draft.

The reason: not many that are chose high make that much of a difference compared to those drafted later.

Between 2009-17, 176 tailbacks rushed at least 200 times in a season, about 19.6 per year. Of that group, 146 of them (83 percent) posted a marginal efficiency between plus-1 percent and minus-10 percent. That’s a pretty significant difference — the difference between a 2009 Jamaal Charles (plus-0.9 percent) and a 2009 Brandon Jacobs (plus-9.6 percent).

It’s also, however, the difference of basically one extra successful carry for every 10 or 11 opportunities, at most about two extra successful rushes per game. Doesn’t sound like such a monstrous difference when you put it that way.

Among the 90 halfbacks who a) were drafted between 2010-17 and b) have been given at least 100 pro carries thus far, few have truly stood out.

Alvin Kamara, your 2017 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year, is the only back to have produced a higher than plus-3 percent marginal efficiency rate, and only two others have been above even plus-1 percent: Montee Ball and Mike Gillislee. Those three were drafted in the third, second, and fifth rounds, respectively.

Of those draftees with at least 500 career carries, only two players have produced an even slightly positive marginal efficiency rate: DeMarco Murray (plus-0.8 percent) and Ezekiel Elliott (plus-0.3).

Bill Connelly, SB Nation

But it’s not all gloom and doom for running backs. Their place in the game isn’t going away, and I’m not even so far convinced as to say their “importance” is going away. It’s just that their usage is changing and in their new usage role they’re proving to be more effective than they’ve ever been.

In 2017, of the 25 running backs who averaged 4.0 yards per carry or more, 15 of them recorded less than 200 carries. On top of that, four pairs of those 25 rushers with 4.0 yards per carry or better averages were teammates.

Do you want good players as running backs: yes, that’s an obvious answer. The question is: at what cost? If you’re drafting a running back high, there’s a hybrid way of thinking where a return on investment and something like a wins above replacement idea doesn’t favor the value of a high draft pick, or even having a feature running back, honestly. What is becoming much more common and much more effective, with the right pairing, is having a running back game plan where two or three backs can rotate in situationally. This allows the offense to remain optimally efficient when running the ball as a compliment to the passing game — since it’s already been established that every offense in today’s NFL should be base around the passing game.

Last season, Peyton Barber was the Bucs’ most efficient running back at just under 4.0 yards per carry. Barber had a very healthy average all year long, and the majority of that came from 10-15 carries per game. I think the Bucs would be wise for that trend to continue, even if he is the best returning option. The reason I think they not only should but can continue that trend is because of a man who was drafted (at an appropriate time in the draft) by Tampa Bay who can not only complement Barber but be that ultimate compliment to the passing game, as well.

Read about that and more on the next page.

All-Twenty Tuesday: Bucs RB Ronald Jones

Coach Boone:
Petey how many feet are in a mile? How many?

Petey Jones:
I dunno.

Coach Boone:
5,280! And you will take this ball and run every single one of them! Your killing me, Petey! Your killing me!

The quote above is from the movie Remember the Titans. It’s a scene during the middle parts of the movie where the team is still trying to find just who their star players are going to be. In it, the running back, Petey Jones, played by Donald Faison, fumbled the ball during a drill and the result was the quotes you read above.

Taking care of the football is a principle that is as old as the game. Any of us who have played the game of football (or even if you haven’t) have surely heard a coach tell them, “Now, I know you didn’t just fumble my football.” It’s important. The ball is the lifeblood of everything. Without the ball, there are no points, there are no wins and there is no success. Every possession is to be treated as a prized possession. That’s why, when you’re the running back and you are handed the ball, carrying the ball should mean something. You have to guard it, protect it, take pride in it.

Bucs RB Ronald Jones II - Photo by: Getty Images
Bucs RB Ronald Jones II – Photo by: Getty Images

The Bucs’ new running back, Ronald Jones II, knows how important that ball is, but that ball isn’t the only thing he carries every time he steps out on that football field.

Ronald Jones Sr. and his son, who many call “RoJo” for short, bonded over the game of football. They were both drawn to players like LaDanian Tomlinson, Robert Griffin III, Thomas Jones and Julius Jones (having the same last name as those last two probably helped their attention). Jones Sr. took his son to his first NFL game when RoJo was just 10 years old. Jones said it was a game between the Cowboys and Redskins. RoJo was born in Fort Stewart, Georgia, as his father’s profession was that of an Army sergeant, but he spent a good amount of his years growing up in McKinney, Texas. When attending his first NFL game, his dad even got the two field passes for after the game. According to a story by David Ubben, the shy 10-year-old RoJo spent most of the time hiding behind his dad instead of running out onto the field.

In 2008, Jones’ parents divorced and Jones II moved with his mother to McKinney. RoJo and his father kept up regularly after his parent’s split. And just as they were close and open in their relationship as father and son, Jones Sr. was open about the health issues that he had and the results they might bring. Jones Sr. was working at Camp Mabry in Austin, Texas after the divorce as a logistics specialist, and for more than a year he was on the list for a heart transplant.

It never came, and in 2012, just two years after he was able to take his son to his first football game, Jones Sr. suffered a heart attack that proved to be fatal.

Per Ubben, the then 15-year-old Jones II wrote a eulogy for his father to read at his funeral, but when the day came to read it, he couldn’t bring himself to do it; it was too emotional for him. Jones brought that emotion to the football field where he received scholarships to play running back at almost every major school around the country. Though the original plan was to stay close to home (Texas), when Jones visited USC, he knew that was the place for him. But, according to his mother, that didn’t come without its doubts. During his first year there, Jones became homesick and wanted to come back to Texas and play at TCU. But his mother convinced him to stay; so he did.

Away from home, Jones learned to live on his own. He learned how to become a man on his own, on and off the football field. He became USC’s starting running back, joined LenDale White as the only true freshmen to ever lead USC in rushing, and a year later after a fourth quarter touchdown, which helped the Trojans’ seal their Rose Bowl comeback in 2016, pointed to the sky to honor his father, no longer as the child hiding behind his dad’s legs on the sidelines, but rather, the man on the field with all eyes watching.

When Ronald Jones II steps out onto the football field, he isn’t just carrying a football. He’s also carrying a name, the name that he shares with his father; a name that is not only how he’s identified on the back of his jersey, but also who he is underneath it.

With that background now fresh in our minds, let’s break open some film and see what it looks like when Jones, in fact, carries the ball to find out just what kind of back the Bucs are getting.

Most of us know the obvious with Jones. He’s a 5-foot-11, 205-pound, 4.44-running back who gives people flashbacks to Jamaal Charles when they watch him run. He’s a back who can truly be a “home run hitter” and has a chance to take a ball to the house no matter how far he is from the goal line on any given play. But, speed players like Jones often get a “needs to be more physical” label to them, and I chose the clip above as the first example of what I like about him because it breaks that narrative real quick.

RoJo is in no way just a scat back. He’s not a “speed only” player. In fact, two of Jones’ most influential traits within his game are his ability to turn momentum into power and then pairing that with good balance, often fighting for extra yards and never wanting to go down or get off his feet, even after he has crossed into the end zone.

The post above is another example of both of those traits.

Running backs that weigh 205 pounds aren’t typically seen as goal line backs, but Jones’ traits allow him to be. In the play above, he got hit immediately in the backfield, but rather than just give up on contact, Jones not only fought through it, but fought through it at an angle that gave him a chance to break free and then continue to make a better play. He did just that, and even as you saw him get into the end zone, you noticed that he never wanted to go down. He stayed up on his feet. I bet that’s something an old coach of his told him and he’s never let it out of his mind. When you’re a running back, having the mindset to never let anyone take you to the ground is one that comes in handing when accumulating yards after contact (a very needed trait in the National Football League, no matter what type of running back you are).

Though we’ve shown that Jones is more than just a speed back and certainly carries both power and balance in his game, there’s no doubt that his bread and butter is his one-cut ability and his burst beyond that to finish big plays.

In the play above, Jones was once again faced with a free defender coming right at him in the back field. As Jones secured the ball, he was able to completely side-step the defender, but even better than that, was able to put his foot in the ground immediately after and start his charge up field. That ability to quickly change from lateral movement to straight line movement is not a given, even with faster running backs. It’s a rare trait, and Jones’ true “trump card,” if you will, that he carries over other backs of his size and skill.

The play above is another one of many example of Jones’ dangerous ability to relocate and then burst up the field.

That little move from juke to top speed is rare, folks. There is such an explosiveness to Jones’ game. Not only does that kind of athletic ability help him generate power to run through defenders, but it also obviously helps move by and run by them, as well. The play above is seriously one of the cleanest jukes I’ve ever seen, and as he often does, Jones finished his move in style with six points.

When going into the NFL Draft, readers love to hear who a certain prospect reminds them of. Jones often gets the Jamaal Charles comparison. I get it. Both of them wear No. 25, both have those shorter dreadlocks, both use speed as the main component of their game. But I didn’t love the comparison.

I don’t really like doing comps for players very much because, though some have similar skills, many readers take things out of context when comps are mentioned and miss the point, which actually then hurts your case and hard work when scouting a player just because you tried to force a comp. A Bucs fan whom I follow, Ken Grant, actually gave the best comparison for Jones that I had heard throughout the draft season.

“RoJo is more like Chris Johnson for me,” Grant said. “Slasher that runs with some power, and can take any cut to the house if it blows open.”

I love it. It’s so spot on. The clip above is such a good example of that, too. When Johnson was at his best in the NFL, it looked like that play. It starts with speed, turns into open field ability, then a little power and balance to get the extra yards and get where he needed to go.

Jones isn’t just a speed guy, but I wouldn’t call him a power guy either. He’s not strictly a north-to-south runner, but he’s not a dancer in the backfield. He’s not strictly a one-cut guy, but he’s not totally just straight line speed; he has some of both. He’s a slasher; he’s Chris Johnson. It’s a perfect description.

Above is a clip of Johnson at the goal line when he was with Tennessee that nearly mirrors Jones’ play from the goal line earlier.

And here’s an example of Johnson breaking tackles, first through the line of scrimmage, then taking it to the house like the clip of Jones doing it against Arizona State.

And finally, in the clip above, we saw Johnson from a shotgun formation in a zone blocking concept, watched him put his foot in the ground to one-cut up field, bounced off a tackler, put his foot in the ground and get right back up to top speed down the sideline. Johnson had the skills to get it done, but what I loved most about him when I watched him growing up is how confident of a runner he was.

That’s Ronald Jones.

Now, Jones doesn’t have the top-end speed Johnson did, but it’s close, and the style is definitely there; Jones’ highlight reel looks very similar to that of Johnson’s. At their best, both win very similarly. As mentioned a bit there, Jones appears to get more out of his skills and his vision when running from zone blocking formation, but that’s not all he can have success with. We’ll likely get deeper into how much zone versus power blocking schemes we can expect from the Buccaneers offensive line this year in a later Cover 3. Jones is also a willing blocker. He’ll sacrifice some of his advantage with smaller size, but when it comes to pass blocking and pass catching, two needed traits to play on third downs in the NFL, Jones is adequate at both. He needs work with both, but he’s adequate.

At just 20 years of age, not only was Ronald Jones one of the better prospects in the draft but he was also one of the more confident ones. He’s come a long way, in that regard. I think that part, as well as his skill and his love of the game, certainly comes from his father, the man who gave his son his name to share.

When RoJo wants to feel close to his late father Ronald Jones Sr., Ubben wrote that Jones II will put his father’s dog tags around his neck. When he puts those on, he’s reminded that he’s not just playing for his own name, but his father’s, as well – one that they share. In the eulogy Jones II wrote for his father, RoJo shared the power and responsibility he believes he carries along with that ball.

“You always gave me the confidence that I could do anything if I put my mind to it,” Jones II wrote. “Trust me. I will do my duty. Just give me the strength.”

Every time you watch Jones “wow” you with another run, you see his talent, you see that confidence, you see the ball and you see his father.

Now you’ll get to see all of that in Tampa Bay as he is one of the newest Buccaneers.

Read-Option: Feature or Committee?

So what do you think of the Bucs’ shiny new offensive weapon?

Do you believe in the power of a running back committee, or do you think that’s just a result of teams not wanting to pay running backs and it would be better to have a feature one anyways?

And what about the Bucs’ current running back depth. Are you happy with it?

How do you view Ronald Jones? Do you think he’s just a committee guy, or do you think he’s the kind of running back who can really lead a backfield and maybe do so on his own?

Do you buy into the Chris Johnson comparison? If not, who does RoJo remind you of?

There’s plenty to talk about with how Tampa Bay should use its running backs going forward with Doug Martin now gone. Let’s hear what you’re hoping they do.

Who do you want as the starting running back for the Buccaneers on Week 1?

25 COMMENTS

  1. We know Barber is a capable back. He definitely runs with a different style. i like the idea of a 60-30-10% split between the top 3 backs (Rojo, Barber, and Jacquizz or Sims, if he can find the magic he had running behind Martin in 2015.)

    It’ll keep everyone fresh throughout the year

  2. I like the pick. We haven’t had a back who can go the distance like Rojo since W. Dunn. I’m good with Barber, and Jones, it’s hanging on to Sims, and Quizz I have a problem with. Hoping one of our try out players can beat one of them out.

  3. Great stuff as always, Trevor. RoJo demonstrated he could carry the full load at USC. Now granted, be will be getting hit by NFL players now. But I would like to see him get the rock at least 60% of the time, with at least 15 carries a game and a few targets. As you showed, every time he gets the ball there is a scoring chance. The other 30-40% can be situationally split between Barber and Sims, with the majority going to Barber. I like that Barber can wear down defenses by pounding the rock, but he isn’t really a threat to bust loose. Sims is pretty useless if he isn’t catching the ball, so he’s a third and long guy. I like Quiz, but he’s a backup guy and should only see the field if there’s injury. I’m excited for this backfield, although I wish they had drafted one more RB to compete. Maybe the kid from Duke makes the squad.

  4. I can see the Chris Johnson comparison. I think Jones can be a 3 down back for sure. Mostl likely going to be a committee backfield with Jones and Barber both getting carries. I just hope that Jones gets most of the carries though. Ronald Jones should be the starting running back.

  5. I’ve always been RB by committee believer somewhat. Although one RB needs to be the featured and get more touches so can get a turned.. Otherwise you shorten careers just handing it off to one guy. Using different backs for different scenarios makes you more versatile. I have good feeling about Jones but honestly our run game wowes last year were more than half due to the poor O line blocking and play. Wouldn’t mattered much if he was here last year IMO.

  6. Damn, the first half of your article was really disappointing Trevor. That’s some pussy bullshit millenial style of football you’re buying into man, and it’s sad. Yeah rawr rawr rawr the rules have changed to started fondling the offense and player safety has timed back defense a tad. But I’m going to point out the greatest csin people have made when labeling the NFL a QB/passing league….having Tom Brady make the SB every other year consistently. As he is the great QB to ever play, and probably ever will be. Because almost every other franchise has built their team through yes a QB, but also a great defense and strong to dominate run to achieve dynastic success or at least consistent playoff success. People all remember the play that lost them the super bowl obviously and we obviously know why it was such a shock, because the Seahawks had a great QB but a just a great RB that had they just won a SB the year before with the same formula, Dominant defense, dominant run game, was right on the goal line again on the verge of winning BACK TO BACK super bowls, just had to stay true to the formula…that we all knew works for over 100 years and they didn’t do it and then they lost. THEN THEN furthermore they haven’t gone back to a super bowl since because WHY?! They traded away max Unger to the aints, beast mode left and they never replenished the trenches…but Russell Wilson is still there taking up like 20%+ of their salary cap right? They deviated from the essence of the game and tried to play bitch football. The Bucs play alot of bitch football. Guarantee now if coach kotter wasn’t such a ridiculous asshole who would commit to running the football more than 50% of the time this year while focus our passing game around a 2 TE play action passing game, while demanding Mike Smith to abandon his pussy style of defense…you don’t need to draft a QB higher than the 2nd Rd..AND AND AND if you balance him out, you don’t over burden him like a 3rd round Russell Wilson or a 6th rd tom Brady or WHOEVER (cause any rookie has a higher success rate if they have a balanced offense not asked to throw maybe 20-25x a game, common sense) they also won’t have over I flared numbers that to lead you to paying these assholes more than 20%+ of your salary cap and stripping your roster like the dumb Seahawks did. There’s a reason the Pat’s let peeps go and Tom Brady is like the only one left for all these…because hes that good yes but also because Robert Kraft and the Pat’s told tom when his first contract negation was coming up, even AFTER he won his first couple rings, “we’re only going to pay you this much, take it or leave it” Bet and then Tom fell in line cause he was winning, I FUCKIN BET YOU!!…but there’s a reason to look at these 2 recent scenarios of you ask me before labeling this a home passing league, cause if it and we’re settled on that, then it needs to include a pass rushing league. Cause pass rushers have been the only things that’s stopped Tom Brady recently.

    Btw Ronald Jones is gonna be great, Dirk just needs to give him the fuckin ball….

    • Love it. First Play Defense!!!! Then run Ron run!!!! Put Vita Vea in there for jumbo pack. Get this supposedly nasty offensive line that they are selling to do the fucking dirty work! But we need defense! We need the defense. Run Ron Run!!!!! Could you imagine the play action then!!! I miss Dungy Ball! Dunn and A Train.

    • Whew. I couldn’t disagree with this more.

      You’re using the greatest success outlier in football history (the Patriots succeeding with a 6th round quarterback who became the greatest winner of all time who, yes, plays on a discount, paired with the greatest coach in history) as an example. It is the outlier. It will never be repeated.

      No one is saying that running backs aren’t needed. But the amount of their ingredients to the formula that is winning is not only lower but also very replaceable in many circumstances. It’s like subbing out your favorite rub or marinade for grilled chicken. Is it essential to the overall good taste at the end? Yes, but could you substitute it with salt or lemon pepper or cajun rub or whatever and still have a good chicken to eat? Yes.

      No one is arguing the defense part. You need a defense to win (duh) — even though the final two best teams in the NFL couldn’t stop a nose bleed against each other in last year’s Super Bowl because, oh, the passing offenses were too good.

  7. Thanks Trevor. I look forward to your cover 3 every week. Did I miss the memo where it was announced the change from it coming out Wednesday instead of Tuesday?
    Those analytics at the beginning of the article were really interesting, as much as some might like smash mouth ground offense it’s just not fit to be effective in today’s game…Kind of like flip phones, they were everything a few years back, but not fit to today’s age if you insist on sticking to it you may feel behind in various aspects of your life!
    I like the idea of running back by committee. Like you mentioned “our pairs of those 25 rushers with 4.0 yards per carry or better averages were teammates.” I think that if you have RBs with different strengths it keeps the defense on their heels.

    • Agree all around. That’s a good example with the flip phone. Running the ball may not be “broken”, but an offense that was based around running the ball needs an upgrade to keep up. Still have much of the similar functionalities, but need to be able to do more — and faster.

  8. Nice article Trevor. My philosophy on players generally is twofold:
    1) play your best players. RoJo is our best RB, so put him on the field….except when:
    2) give your best players time out to rest…be that when they are clearly tired, and/or when the game doesn’t need them (like 4th quarter of a blowout; or short yardage running; etc.) If we’re going to obviously run out the clock for the remainder of the 4th quarter, however much time that is, then get Winston out of the game.

    I hate platooning – have rarely seen that be particularly effective. Equally hate seeing star players playing in meaningless minutes.

    RoJo – for what it’s worth, after zero NFL snaps – reminds me of Emmitt Smith….why not.

  9. And what do you make of the Seahawks downfall then, and you better go eat some award winning BBQ before you go and make some stupid reference like that again. That’s blasphemy on a different level. And sure I’m sussing the greatest QB and head coaching tandem of all time as an outlier, THEY’VE INFLUECED THE GAME THAT MUCH!!! I like how you were so surprised on the draft podcast when Tom Coughlin drafted Taven Bryan in the first round…well of you were actually watching that AFC championship game you’d realize Jacksonville wasn’t a better QB away from replacing Tom Brady last year, but probably a Taven Bryan away from doing so. Their rele tiles defense and punishing ground game nearly made Tom tap, just like Denver’s defense did, just like Seattle’s did, just like the Steelers have done in dynasties and the 49ers and the cowboys. Now I know you’re gonna say that, all those teams had what to be considered great QBs…but can we say they would have had the same success they ended up having if they weren’t developed without the help of a great defense and a great running game, which all of them had? We can’t know that unfortunately, but we do know that doing it that way WORKS WITH A HIGH SUCCESS RATE, that’s why it could work with a 6th rd pick or a 3rd rd pick or a 1st round pick….why has Marcus Mariota been to the playoffs before Jameis winston twice now? Your own boss wrote about this? QBs need to be catered to by being coddled and sheltered like children until they are ready to run. Jameis especially, it’s not like hes Dan fucking Marino over here….

    • I have no idea what you’re arguing at this point.

      The Seahawks ignored their offensive line for years. That was their downfall. When have I ever said offensive line wasn’t important? Marshawn retired from the Seahawks for that and other stupid front office moves.

      I was surprised that the Jags took Bryan, but I’ve also said multiple times times that I loved their draft because they made their strengths stronger with an emphasis on the defensive line.

      I’ve never said running backs don’t have a place in the game. What I’ve said is that it’s proven that, in most cases, you can get one or two running backs later in the draft and that can often be the best thing for your team in terms of production and in terms of the money you spend on players.

      Teams are scoring more and gaining more yards than they ever have before. They’re also passing more and running less than they ever have before. Reason for this is because, at the top, passing the ball is superior. It’s more difficult, it has the higher risk and the more reward.

      I’ve never said that team shouldn’t run. I’ve said that in today’s age you often have to run to compliment the pass. You need both, but it’s very clear that one allows you to be more efficient on offense than the other. Every team needs a run game. I’m just trying to logically map out how to acquire one in the most efficient way.

  10. Dude, ok do you advocate teams passing the ball more than 25x a game, every game even if it ends up taking over 55% of your play style? And while were here, might as well ask if you think if passing the ball 25x or more a game every game is best for Jameis Winston overall development?

  11. Here’s what I know. There at least has to be a viable threat in the backfield. You can’t have Dougie Martin and his less than 3 yards a carry allowing the opponent to be on the other side laughing. Put the explosive Rojo back there and see the newfound respect after he blows by them for a TD. Put his skills at the goal line so teams can’t simply play pass defense.

  12. All I’m asking for is an explanation as to why the NFL is considered a QB league, with offenses catering to the pass first? It just seems to me that Tom Brady and bill belichick have pulled one over on the entire league fooling everyone into thinking that you can sustain this new type of production is sustainable to a dynasty like level…no, Trevor you’re right they are the greatest to do it and that’s why we will never see this type of success ever again. I’m using that argument against you. Even the other great QBS can’t measure up, and its evident in the depth of their playoff runs compared to him…none of them come one in SB appearances or even conference championship appearances.. not peyton, Aaron Rodgers, Joe Montana, Troy Aikman, Dan Marino…having a passing based offense doesn’t usually find success consistently in the playoffs and still hasn’t equaled out to multiple championships, or even consistent Championship contention…but having a run based offense sure has…and that hasn’t changed just because a few rules changed. That’ll be the case as long as these grown men are allowed to tackle each other, period, no matter how they are allowed to it. I think that’s where this perception lies.