This is truth. Other teams seldom rely on a true "X" because they have other weapons to diminish the need for an "X". And as knees said, having athletes all over the field (which is what Tampa has on paper right now) is probably the better scenario than relying on a true "X" receiver.Pre-snap motion and lots of interchangeable formations have made the X less and less of a static thing.
Not many teams use a true X.
Yes agreed, but all those top teams have someone who defenses often have to double or bracket. Egbuka ran into that last season, so maybe healthier Godwin or McMillan or even Hurst makes teams pay for that
This is truth. Other teams seldom rely on a true "X" because they have other weapons to diminish the need for an "X". And as knees said, having athletes all over the field (which is what Tampa has on paper right now) is probably the better scenario than relying on a true "X" receiver.Pre-snap motion and lots of interchangeable formations have made the X less and less of a static thing.
Not many teams use a true X.
Yes agreed, but all those top teams have someone who defenses often have to double or bracket. Egbuka ran into that last season, so maybe healthier Godwin or McMillan or even Hurst makes teams pay for that
it would be great to see a spread it around passing game next season, sort of like Coen. and it think playing to the strength of Mayfield. especially is some of it is short, rhythm passing.