soy boy.
right on cue, Biggs struggling with his own sexuality
"“I don’t do this with men very often. I started examining his body, because I didn’t know he was a great athlete. And I looked and I watched up and down. I looked at his ass and I looked at the whole – and then I looked at his hands. Look at his hands. He’s got these, like, claws,” Trump said.
Calling people gay, it's like I'm playing halo 2 twenty years ago on Xbox.
soy boy.
right on cue, Biggs struggling with his own sexuality
"“I don’t do this with men very often. I started examining his body, because I didn’t know he was a great athlete. And I looked and I watched up and down. I looked at his ass and I looked at the whole – and then I looked at his hands. Look at his hands. He’s got these, like, claws,” Trump said.
Calling people gay,
Biggs can pray about himself tomorrow, but as sure as the sun rises in the east (100% GUARANTEE) he will be right back here proving I am a savant. This was on page 11 of this now 22 page thread:
your "guarantee" doesn't mean jack shit
LOL!
In fact it only took two pages for Biggs to come out:
I do want to be apart of it - which is why I'm apart of it. I'm enjoying watching you
and the rest is (predictable) history
100% Guarantee Biggs will be back soon . .
Retarded hill to die on. The next post is one of the sources ai used to create the summary.
Do you not know how Gemini works?
So that’s a no, which was obvious from the beginning. You plagiarized. You presented Gemini’s words as your own. Nice of you to finally credit the actual source, since you weren’t able to develop those words on your own. All while telling somebody else they should read a book.
What hill am I dying on? The one where you plagiarized because you don’t know what plagiarism and citing sources means? There’s a reason you’re having flail around here, although I’m pretty sure you’re oblivious to it.
You still can't argue the actual debate and instead want to autistic screech about an AI summary.
I said Trump is a Russian asset. Your content argument is, I need to write you a love letter instead of utilizing a tool...
You clearly haven’t noticed that I have no desire to “argue” with an ignorant leftist nut job like yourself, Candy. You are firmly in the point-and-laugh group of useful idiots. I’m not very impressed with a virtue-signaling plagiarist like yourself. Hell it took you multiple pages to even understand what plagiarism is, and I still have doubts that you understand what is being discussed.
When you posted those links, do you think you put in any more effort than I did using AI? You probably didn't even read your articles.
Sweet Geebus, this fuggin’ idiot still can’t grasp the simple concept of citing a source.
Fucking rainman arguments are so weird
Yeah, mansplaining what plagiarism is to what I’m assuming is an adult is pretty weird. But I should have known the soy boys struggle with simple concepts. Their life view proves it.
https://bylinetimes.com/2026/10/19/a-short-history-of-trumps-long-held-connections-to-russia/
Feel free to start sucking your thumb you fucking neanderthal.
We put up with Trump in the NFL because his ties to Russia are made up by historical data and facts .. durrrr
You mean like this source fucktard?
This has been a fun red herring exercise but we all know you can't debate shit so it's "your dumb" "TDS" "orange man bad" "soy boy" or "libtard".
Maybe stop plagiarizing others insults and come up with your own, rainman?
You clearly haven’t noticed that I have no desire to “argue” with an ignorant leftist nut job like yourself, Candy
bwhahahahahahahahahaha
someone should tell him, right?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DexbjyAk-dN/?dlrf=MTdibWViZzhtaGMyNw==
"God gave us Trump".
Lmfao
Retards
You clearly haven’t noticed that I have no desire to “argue” with an ignorant leftist nut job like yourself, Candy
bwhahahahahahahahahaha
someone should tell him, right?
He only argues the real issues.
Referencing AI is plaigarizing.
Posts links you don't read is 4d chess.
Durrrr
Hell it took you multiple pages to even understand what plagiarism is, and I still have doubts that you understand what is being discussed.
Those doubts have been come to fruition. The soy boy still doesn't understand what he did and why it's plagiarism. I'll break this down one last time for your dumbass.
You posted the following, without attributing (or citing for the leftists among us) where it came from:
How It Works
• Kompromat: This term refers to damaging, embarrassing, or incriminating material (real or fabricated) such as secret videos, audio recordings, photographs, financial trails, or correspondence.
• Historical Playbook: Tracing back to the Soviet KGB, the practice was used to control domestic rivals, entrap foreign diplomats stationed in Moscow, and coerce targets into cooperation rather than facing public ruin.
• Modern Expansion: Under Vladimir Putin, state security agencies (such as the FSB and GRU) combine traditional "honeytraps," surveillance, and physical stakeouts with modern cyberhacking, digital leaks, and social media manipulation.
Objectives in Foreign Governments
• Coercion and Recruitment: Intelligence services use compromising material to blackmail foreign officials, diplomats, or business figures into quietly cooperating or sharing sensitive data.
• Disruption and Discrediting: Files or fabricated narratives are deployed to sabotage political campaigns, derail policy decisions, paralyze opposition figures, or erode trust in democratic institutions.
• Broad Active Measures: Blackmail operates alongside other state-backed tactics, including covert funding of political parties, disinformation networks, and cyber espionage (as documented in operations investigated by Western intelligence agencies).
You have now admitted it came from Google's Gemini AI. You presented those words as your own. They were not. They were from Google Gemini. They were not from this link:
https://bylinetimes.com/2026/10/19/a-short-history-of-trumps-long-held-connections-to-russia/
The words "Historical Playbook, Modern Expansion, honeytraps, Coercion and Recruitment, Disruption and discrediting, Broad Active Measures, disinformation, etc." were nowhere in that link. That's because that link isn't the source of those words - the uncited Gemini is. You copied and pasted from Google Gemini, not that link. You plagiarized, and are too stupid to understand that you plagiarized - even with this breakdown written for a third-grader.
This will be the last time I address this particular incident of plagiarism. Since you still have no idea what is being discussed, I have no doubt there will be future instances. I will be pointing and laughing at the useful idiot when that happens.
just like I can guarantee that you and Biggs will be the drivers of the traffic in this thread lol
Through 21 pages of this thread with 315 posts, here is the tally of traffic drivers:
Fire - 117 posts or 37.1%
Loon - 69 posts or 21.9%
Bada - 57 posts or 18.1%
Biggs - 35 posts or 11.1%
DH - 12 posts or 3.8%
Turd - 7 posts or 2.2%
BucBalla - 7 posts or 2.2%
Knees - 6 posts or 1.9%
ADW - 4 posts or 1.3%
Seekpar - 1 post or 0.3%
I know having the ability to count to 90 and do simple math impresses the shit out of the leftists. Stay seated, fucktards. A child could accomplish this.
Surprisingly enough, the liberal blowhards are posting more than anybody else. Their moral superiority has to be told and the low-T has to be displayed for all to see. Those two self-righteous "traffic drivers" have posted (59% - and rising) more than the other eight posters (41%) have combined, by a 18+% landslide.
just like I can guarantee that you and Biggs will be the drivers of the traffic in this thread lol
Through 21 pages of this thread with 315 posts, here is the tally of traffic drivers:
Fire - 117 posts or 37.1%
Loon - 69 posts or 21.9%
Bada - 57 posts or 18.1%
Biggs - 35 posts or 11.1%
DH - 12 posts or 3.8%
Turd - 7 posts or 2.2%
BucBalla - 7 posts or 2.2%
Knees - 6 posts or 1.9%
ADW - 4 posts or 1.3%
Seekpar - 1 post or 0.3%
I know having the ability to count to 90 and do simple math impresses the shit out of the leftists. Stay seated, fucktards. A child could accomplish this.
Surprisingly enough, the liberal blowhards are posting more than anybody else. Their moral superiority has to be told and the low-T has to be displayed for all to see. Those two self-righteous "traffic drivers" have posted (59% - and rising) more than the other eight posters (41%) have combined, by a 18+% landslide.
Rainman doing Rainman things.
This post took 8 seconds.
How long did it take you to write this tism rant?
Hell it took you multiple pages to even understand what plagiarism is, and I still have doubts that you understand what is being discussed.
Those doubts have been come to fruition. The soy boy still doesn't understand what he did and why it's plagiarism. I'll break this down one last time for your dumbass.
You posted the following, without attributing (or citing for the leftists among us) where it came from:
How It Works
• Kompromat: This term refers to damaging, embarrassing, or incriminating material (real or fabricated) such as secret videos, audio recordings, photographs, financial trails, or correspondence.
• Historical Playbook: Tracing back to the Soviet KGB, the practice was used to control domestic rivals, entrap foreign diplomats stationed in Moscow, and coerce targets into cooperation rather than facing public ruin.
• Modern Expansion: Under Vladimir Putin, state security agencies (such as the FSB and GRU) combine traditional "honeytraps," surveillance, and physical stakeouts with modern cyberhacking, digital leaks, and social media manipulation.
Objectives in Foreign Governments
• Coercion and Recruitment: Intelligence services use compromising material to blackmail foreign officials, diplomats, or business figures into quietly cooperating or sharing sensitive data.
• Disruption and Discrediting: Files or fabricated narratives are deployed to sabotage political campaigns, derail policy decisions, paralyze opposition figures, or erode trust in democratic institutions.
• Broad Active Measures: Blackmail operates alongside other state-backed tactics, including covert funding of political parties, disinformation networks, and cyber espionage (as documented in operations investigated by Western intelligence agencies).
You have now admitted it came from Google's Gemini AI. You presented those words as your own. They were not. They were from Google Gemini. They were not from this link:
https://bylinetimes.com/2026/10/19/a-short-history-of-trumps-long-held-connections-to-russia/
The words "Historical Playbook, Modern Expansion, honeytraps, Coercion and Recruitment, Disruption and discrediting, Broad Active Measures, disinformation, etc." were nowhere in that link. That's because that link isn't the source of those words - the uncited Gemini is. You copied and pasted from Google Gemini, not that link. You plagiarized, and are too stupid to understand that you plagiarized - even with this breakdown written for a third-grader.
This will be the last time I address this particular incident of plagiarism. Since you still have no idea what is being discussed, I have no doubt there will be future instances. I will be pointing and laughing at the useful idiot when that happens.
Autism
Jfc
Straight up autism
I have no idea what's being discussed? You're attempting to use an anchor argument for plagiarism but nobody cares about that. Idgaf what you think about how I sourced a response...my words, an article, quoting an article, using AI...
The actual topic was "Trump is a Russian asset".
You can't argue against that so you're arguing using your super power: being autistic.
Great work, rainman
Biggs being wrong on the substance and then diverting to nonsense is Biggs101 and exactly why I said 100% Guaranteed
it's why the "White is RB1" thread went on for pages lol.
maybe we should bring back the PPP loan data and talk about "socialism"
I recall that stopped Biggs in his tracks once before. I think right after he was posting about "leftists" taking government $
lol
clown show
Maybe if y'all argue a little harder it will convince the other of your pov. Would be amazing if you could come to some kind of agreement but I don't see how that could happen with how they have things set up now days. Like I said earlier, done on purpose to keep it a circle jerk..
Maybe if y'all argue a little harder it will convince the other of your pov
Biggs has already posted that CLEARLY he DOES NOT LIKE ARGUING!
;-)
(they are even discussing politics at this point lol)
Maybe if y'all argue a little harder it will convince the other of your pov. Would be amazing if you could come to some kind of agreement but I don't see how that could happen with how they have things set up now days. Like I said earlier, done on purpose to keep it a circle jerk..
Is it hypocritical to complain about politics in the NFL the be ok with Trump joining NFL games and being interviewed?
Can one person recognize the hypocrisy?
If one person can I'll never post on this thread again!
