who were you thinking of?

Dont they want McCollum to be the #1?   if they dont then first pick is CB?

  Football: 1 Latent Homosexuality: 1   Proud of you Biggs  

For sure. "Productive starter" was just the way the author chose. Draft round 1-3 and productive starter. Only part of the GM job

In another similar article Roseman and Sirriani suggest they critique their picks in the 3rd year after the draft, so the player has had time to learn...

Another is maybe ownership. Glazers have Licht operating on a cash budget versus Lurie with an almost open check book for Roseman.  

Football: 0 Latent homosexuality: 1   Must be a day that end in a "Y"  

yes i just posted in a reply that if we go to some other subjective standard the outcome might change. Roseman is a good GM so not taking anything a...

Yes and this comparison is just drafts so only one data point and subjective at that   even with drafts if you change the standard the varian...

  Not to take anything away from Roseman but it is also Lurie. You can see that just by comparing the Eagle to the Bucs   The Glazers...

This is not the Bucs, at least from what I can tell. They would probably want some discount off of $50 but thats a lot different then low balling or ...

Dies that actually sound like the Bucs (pay him off of 2025) to you? It will all work out.

of course its a resource allocation thing because everything is a resource allocation thing and the Bucs have one of the most expensive O lines? top 5...

  Good point. Every dollar matters. This was on PFT today   "On PFT Live, Chris Simms and I went through the list of Tampa Bay quarte...